Anonymous ID: fbb618 Dec. 18, 2018, 6:14 p.m. No.4369276   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9339 >>9366 >>9467 >>9529 >>9642

>>4368648 lb

Not to attack you… But for me this was obvious. Classification is often used as a form of entrapment as you participate in something classified and then can't disclose that it occurred or details about it… Even when issues become public record.

 

For example, let's say that I was in some kind of super secret squirrel operation, and unredacted documents were to make their way into the public and I was listed by name as doing x, y, and z. My answer is, effectively, "no" or "I have no recollection." Just because there is spillage of classified information does not technically allow one to talk about it or confirm it. Until it is declassified, properly, one can't comment. Even then, many government jobs come with a standard 80 year NDA where, technically, we aren't supposed to talk about our work. Average male lifespan is 85 and military enlistment begins at 16 with parental consent… Math that out.

 

Obviously, this is a problem if by public record your actions indicate illegal activity, but you were actually acting properly per an agency program or instruction. Even if you can fight it legally, there are all manner of tactics to draw out a case and make it financially impossible to fight your way through appeals processes and corrupt judges as you try to subpoena for classified material.

 

Mueller isn't corrupt. Mueller is bringing an apparent violation of the law to the court for review. That we are judging Mueller as corrupt is simply because we are allowing the media to project the problem of the courts onto the prosecutor.

 

That is also why the case was pushed into an Article 1 court. A move pushed by Mueller. This came as the case moved into documents and subjects under seal and the judge recused himself.

It's all coming into play, and it's all going to move extremely fast from here.

 

There are multiple parallel investigations and cases. All of these cases are liberating evidence to be used by prosecutors and defense alike - it's all interconnected. Rogue specwar, human trafficking, charity abuse, political racketeering, treason…

An avalanche doesn't start with a single ball rolling down hill and picking up more snow. It starts when a layer of snow/ice fails in its hold on the layers above… And the paradigm shifts on the mountain.

 

Mueller was an avalanche diode, in circuit terms. The boundary layer has collapsed, full conduction.

Anonymous ID: fbb618 Dec. 18, 2018, 6:32 p.m. No.4369578   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9666

>>4369270

This is a very risky idea, and people should avoid mass demonstrations. Even the mostly-peaceful protests in Europe are seeing some instigation and attempts to turn them violent and/or portray them as violent.

Americans should, instead, show up at their city council meetings as individuals looking to contribute, contact their local, state, and national representatives, etc.

 

There are active agitators in America who are poised to turn large gatherings violent. POTUS has security and other such things at his rallies. Brilliant national security sting, by the way.

Impromptu rallies do not have such things in place, and agitators can more freely infiltrate and do their thing.

 

I'm not saying it can't be done, but that is a consequence you must be prepared for. Not just as you, personally, but the people who join you. The media has pre-agitated many and social media has only served to inflame it. The same people pushing doubt of the plan are also the same people pushing rallies and outrage.

They want the rallies to provoke violence.

I can't be more clear or voice this more strongly as a warning, special warfare encompasses all forms of asymmetric warfare, and you are in the middle of a battlefield.

 

When people die at large rallies, they win. When people get angry or paranoid and begin arming themselves at public rallies, they have a powder keg they are just looking to toss a match into.

 

Think carefully before committing.