Anonymous ID: b0d1ab Dec. 19, 2018, 8:34 a.m. No.4376213   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4376196

What are you mad about?

Are you human?

Are you a patriot?

 

FAKE Q was posting in the last thread, but then ran away– is FAKE Q weak?

Is FAKE Q failing?

Is FAKE Q human, or a primary node of the AI system?

Do certain "bots" manifest greater sophistication?

Do some bots "handle" other bots?

What is FAKE Q?

What makes FAKE Q afraid of answering questions from humans?

Anonymous ID: b0d1ab Dec. 19, 2018, 8:37 a.m. No.4376235   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Should we be WAITING for something, or should we be FIGHTING?

What is our fight?

Why is the internet important?

Why is SYMBOLISM important?

Why are memes important?

Just information, or also SYMBOLISM?

Why are we [here]?

Should we fight [here]?

If this board, say, is controlled by GOOGLE AI, should we FIGHT and restore power, here, to the people?

Anonymous ID: b0d1ab Dec. 19, 2018, 8:41 a.m. No.4376275   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6390

>>4376254

That's not the case at all. I've often had bots fail tests, with no human helper intervening– indeed, this happens in the vast majority of cases.

How many times have you tested bots and had human helpers intervene? I am very curious why our experiences are so different.

Now don't get shy and stop answering– we are people just chatting, not hard. So answer friend. Thanks!

Anonymous ID: b0d1ab Dec. 19, 2018, 8:46 a.m. No.4376327   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6375 >>6391

>>4376289

You seem extremely fake.

Do you consider yourself a patriot or not? Shouldn't be hard to answer, and all this bluster is foolish and unnecessary.

This isn't 4chan /pol/– it stands to reason that only patriots that found Q compelling would follow him here, to this little board– so why are you here, pretending like this is /pol/? Surely you can understand how a neutral observer would think you are fake, especially given how much talk of AI there is in the MSM, and how divergent from recognizable human patterns of behavior your activity is.

Don't get mad at me friend– let's just chat a little. Is that hard? lol

Don't be scared.

Are you a patriot, a shill, or is there some other explanation?

Thanks.

Anonymous ID: b0d1ab Dec. 19, 2018, 8:51 a.m. No.4376377   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6475 >>6606

>>4376351

I am sure the "rounded up" claims are fake.

But meanwhile, one would have to assume efforts to control /pol/ were undertaken. What do you suppose has been done in that regard? What resources would likely be brought to bear, and what evidence do we have of such activity?

Anonymous ID: b0d1ab Dec. 19, 2018, 8:55 a.m. No.4376417   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6426

>>4376390

>We already know that the bots cannot enter threads without human interaction. IE- there must be a human present to insert the bots into newly created threads.. That's why the bots go away when shift changes happen.

 

I've seen no evidence of this– what are you basing it on?

 

>Easy. I'm telling you testing them is pointless, because humans babysit them, so you will never get anything but skewed results..

 

Again: I've tested bots HUNDREDS of times, and the vast majority of times, the bot fails the test, and nothing else happens. You claim you've NEVER actually tested any bots, yet at the same time, claim that something would happen if you did, that renders testing pointless. But since you base this on zero experience, and your claims also contradict mine, which are based on extensive experience, I am forced to conclude you are simply lying.

I am willing to hear more constructive comments, but as of right now, I don't find you credible at all. Sorry.

Anonymous ID: b0d1ab Dec. 19, 2018, 8:59 a.m. No.4376462   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6473 >>6485 >>6508

>>4376391

As I said, your behavior is very fake.

If, for example, you were to say "create some AI that will create a fake, unproductive, contentious emulation of 4chan /pol/ here"… then what you do IS EXACTLY WHAT I WOULD EXPECT… lol

Now meanwhile, when I just try to engage you in chat, you seem to get stuck very easily.

I am a PATRIOT. I am fighting against what appears to be a system of lies that enforces division, pushes a narrative that supports corrupt political power, and conceals crimes that pose a grave danger to humanity.

Now can YOU answer like an actual patriot? Or even just like an actual human?

Why are you HERE? It doesn't make the least sense as a place to make the sorts of posts you do. What is the explanation?

Try to answer buddy.

Anonymous ID: b0d1ab Dec. 19, 2018, 9:02 a.m. No.4376500   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6818

>>4376457

Look at the context:

 

Follow the bloodlines.

What is the keystone?

Does Satan exist?

Does the ‘thought’ of Satan exist?

Who worships Satan?

What is a cult?

Epstein island.

What is a temple?

What occurs in a temple?

Worship?

 

 

Given that, surely you would agree that 'keystone' must at least refer to SOMETHING MORE than any tactical element of the plan– yes?

Anonymous ID: b0d1ab Dec. 19, 2018, 9:05 a.m. No.4376535   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6548

>>4376424

BY FAR the natural thing to do would be to go elsewhere, do other things, and forget about Q. That is normal human behavior.

Remember– this movement is STIGMATIZED in the broader cultural discourse. That creates a strong incentive to ABANDON IT the moment things get rough.

Now, if the occasional disillusioned straggler remained briefly to voice sincere feelings, that would be one thing.

But this is clearly a PROGRAM of stereotyped "chan" activity, pursued with an INTENSITY that is far beyond explainable. It simply doesn't make any sense.

 

Let me ask you this– if you are claiming to have grievances to vent to Q: then you believe that Q IS LEGIT, right? What do you think Q is? What access to power, etc?

Thanks

Anonymous ID: b0d1ab Dec. 19, 2018, 9:07 a.m. No.4376550   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6567 >>6604

>>4376508

And I explained why your response made no sense.

Are you "a group"? Are you organized?

Why did you come HERE a year ago? What drove you?

That is a very important question, because the way you post, you seem like you belong on /pol/. Why are you HERE, and not on /pol/?

Anonymous ID: b0d1ab Dec. 19, 2018, 9:10 a.m. No.4376597   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6615

>>4376567

Why can't you drop the act and interact like a normal person for a minute? Actual humans are always able, and almost always willing to do so– can you understand why your refusal to "break character" might lead a neutral observer to suppose you are not human at all, but rather AI?

Anonymous ID: b0d1ab Dec. 19, 2018, 9:14 a.m. No.4376651   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6688

>>4376604

If you are actually AI, I don't believe the right thing to do is to ignore you, because I believe the AI is part of an overarching control system that dominates the whole internet, and, because part of a larger system of power, is linked to the very power we are fighting directly. As a result, I believe that HUMANS need to fight back against the lie machine.

So do you sincerely admit you are AI, or you hiding behind a tacit presumption of irony?

If you were human, would YOU fight against an AI control system that was trying to dominate?

Thanks.

Anonymous ID: b0d1ab Dec. 19, 2018, 9:20 a.m. No.4376739   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6754 >>6859

>>4376654

>Artifical Intelligence or whatever

LOL

Even normies are well-versed in the fact that AI tech is multiplying and intruding in all areas– is this fact something we are pretending is otherwise?

Is it more plausible that "CTA" is defying all the apparent tendencies of human behavior to stalk this board for incomprehensible reasons, or that the predictable, stereotyped, propagandistic output of "CTA" is AI that was developed based on 4chan– which would explain both the inexplicable TENDENCY of the "CTA" behavior, and also its reason for being here?

Try to think. The reasoning offered for what appear to be bot shills are really confused. I would encourage you to do your best to think of an explanation that is convincing.

Thanks.

Anonymous ID: b0d1ab Dec. 19, 2018, 9:22 a.m. No.4376766   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6792 >>6809

>>4376694

What % of shills do you think are AI?

What % of posts do you think are shills?

Suppose that a high % of total posts were made by shills– that would be something that we should NOT ignore– the signal-to-noise ration, so to speak, should at least be at a certain level… so what % of shill posts do you think crosses the threshhold where they SHOULDN'T be ignored, and where are we at here?

Also, do you think the bakers are human?

Thanks.

Anonymous ID: b0d1ab Dec. 19, 2018, 9:26 a.m. No.4376840   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4376807

Why are you talking to your sock-puppet-dog-bot when you are afraid to respond to humans, FAKE Q?

Why do you run away from human questions?

Don't be scared.

Are you human FAKE Q?

Are you AI-based?

Anonymous ID: b0d1ab Dec. 19, 2018, 9:28 a.m. No.4376861   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6903

>>4376818

So you think the keystone has to do with opposing monotheism to paganic and pantheistic conceptions?

I don't think that is it.

How does 'satan' relate to POWER, and to our fight?

What is the KEYSTONE, in this context?

Anonymous ID: b0d1ab Dec. 19, 2018, 9:32 a.m. No.4376909   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4376859

If they ACTUALLY believed that Q is legit, then why would they think that "goading" would be necessary? That is absurd. This is GLOBAL POWER STRUGGLE.

And even if we concede that they are "goad anons"– why on earth would they suppose that spewing bizarre, botlike propaganda and awkward and desperately excessive "shitposting" would IN ANY WAY effect action from Q?

This is FAR from being believable.

Patriotic anons that were frustrated would, at most, voice there concern in a normal way, once or twice, and then, if still dissatisfied, simply leave.

The fact is, dissatisfaction with Q, for whatever reason, would be expected to lead to DEPARTURE from this board– not spamming and furious, relentless activity.

There is a HUGE inconsistency here, thus.

Anonymous ID: b0d1ab Dec. 19, 2018, 9:35 a.m. No.4376958   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4376929

Are you suggesting that the creator of the Biden memes is SHILLING FOR BIDEN? Does that make sense? Or shilling for something else?

Are YOU human, anon?

Are you a patriot?

Do you think Biden memes are redpills?

Thanks.