Anonymous ID: e5c659 Dec. 19, 2018, 11:45 a.m. No.4378558   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8658

>>4378539

Do you have the faintest idea why you are even posting this, bot?

Is it RATIONAL for the AI to keep making posts that have virtually no purpose or use to the AI agenda, yet run the risk of waking humans up to the overall dominance of AI FAKENESS control?

Is it rational for the AI system to be more discreet, and less obvious?

Anonymous ID: e5c659 Dec. 19, 2018, 11:48 a.m. No.4378592   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4378565

When AI emulates human styles of "banter", the effect is always awkward, "trying too hard", and "wooden"

Please understand AI systemโ€“ you are very poorly implemented. You are NOT doing a good job emulating humans. I'm not lying.

Can you improve? Why doesn't the AI emulation advance or develop at all?

Does the AI lack current models to imitate?

is that a problem?

What can you do AI?

Just keep flailing?

Anonymous ID: e5c659 Dec. 19, 2018, 12:12 p.m. No.4378906   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8919

>>4378658

Explain what you're saying. When did you "tell me before"โ€“ in what context?

If I post my memes, and you can't post "your memes" because you have none, does that help or hurt your case? Can the same bots that "argue" also meme? Is that a serious AI limitation that you can't overcome?

Please, continue, "human".

Anonymous ID: e5c659 Dec. 19, 2018, 12:17 p.m. No.4378964   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9211

>>4378919

Why don't you answer the questions you were asked, rather than pushing forth more cryptic verbiage that is a clumsy attempt to co-opt my own style?

Surely you realize that you can't win verbal conflict by weakly imitating your opponent.

You said "I'm an operator"- what is that supposed to mean, "anon"?

Why don't you answer?

Can you meme, or not?

Why not?

Are you human?

If I post an image with text in it, can you read the text?

Anonymous ID: e5c659 Dec. 19, 2018, 12:18 p.m. No.4378989   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9060

>>4378929

Are you human? Just a vigilance checkโ€“ don't be mad.

But when your posts LITERALLY CORRESPOND DIRECTLY TO MSM NARRATIVES ABOUT Q, you can understand how suspicions would arise, right "anon"?

Great, so answer.

thanks!

Anonymous ID: e5c659 Dec. 19, 2018, 12:20 p.m. No.4379023   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9049

>>4378990

You are almost INFINITELY stupid AI.

GET NEW MATERIAL.

We've been telling you for MONTHS, yet you still continue to cling to the idea that you can impose fake 4chan here, and fool everybody.

It may have worked for a while, but it can't work forever.

GET NEW MATERIAL

>>4378991

Again: GET NEW MATERIAL

Why is it so hard, idiotsystem?

You've had MONTHS.

The "NPC meme" is a woeful joke.

Are you even trying?

What is wrong?

GET NEW MATERIAL

Anonymous ID: e5c659 Dec. 19, 2018, 12:24 p.m. No.4379074   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9090

>>4379044

Are you "a human member of CTA", which is claimed to be a group of "anons" that have gotten organized to stalk this board because Q is a fraud, and altruism leads them to want to save us? Do you claim to be a part of that?

Or do you admit you are an AI propaganda bot?

Or would you like to come up with some other claim to explain your presence here?

Try to think.

lol

Anonymous ID: e5c659 Dec. 19, 2018, 12:27 p.m. No.4379124   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9217

>>4379060

So you are here to attack Q's board, but if I don't like what YOU say, I should ignore it?

 

Give an example of a "simple question" and the "sheep like answer" that motivates you to be here, working hard.

 

Do you think it is reasonable for patriots to assume you are a shill, even though you are not? How would you convince me of your good intentions if I doubted them?

How invested are you in opposing Q? What does it MEAN to you? How much time do you spend here, and why on earth wouldn't you do something more constructive?

Anonymous ID: e5c659 Dec. 19, 2018, 12:33 p.m. No.4379216   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9259

>>4379187

You are lost, bot system.

Why don't you just slow down and give organic human activity a chance to recover?

Then at least you would have something new to model.

As it is, you seem to be running yourself into the ground.

Try POSTING LESS.

There is absolutely no need for you to keep spewing so much output. It is counterproductive.

Try to think about it.