lawfag here

anons just came upon the RULING in the mysterious DC grand jury subpoena case - have not seen it posted yet - linkl below

pretty confusing to read ill try to summarize what is reveals

a federal prosecutor (doesnt reveal who) issues a subpeona for documents to a company owned by a foreign GOVERNMENT (not speficied) that company tried to quash the subpeona on various legal grounds which were plausible - but the district court ruled against them and upheld the subpoena - this appeals decision AFFIRMED the district court and the subpoena must be coimplied - plus the $5000 per week fine for contempt also approved

digworthy to find the mystery company = the only real clues are: a corporation (“the Corporation”) owned by Country A and that claimed the subpoena would require the Corporation to violate Country A’s domestic law

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000167-c36a-df35-adef-df6f4e7c0001

>>4383107

that truth gem triggered em all right

keks

>>4383109

thoughtful post anon but i have to diagree

the GA cannot depdn upon a new set ofd laws - even constitutional ones

it depends upon just what it says - an awakening of the human spirit which will usehd is a WW order where good prevails over evil

the exact opposite of what we have had till now

then only simple laws will be needed guided by common sense and justice

lies and cheating and evil will no longer be permitted by WE THE PEOPLE

>>4383256

>>4383378

n anon do not think that is the curret case - too old

believe that is a case CITED to support the district courts decision and the fine