Anonymous ID: a28b03 Dec. 19, 2018, 8:40 p.m. No.4386522   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6545

>>4386453

I think you mentioned this LB anon. You could be right, but all I heard is that she "might" have already violated her position before even being sworn in by twatting something about 'subpoena powers'. I doubt anything will come of it though.