>>4388691 l.b.

>https://www.lawfareblog.com/what-make-mystery-judgment-re-grand-jury-subpoena

The court asserts that “there is no question” that the Corporation falls within the definition of a “foreign state” under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) for the purposes of sovereign immunity. It specifically cites 28 U.S.C. § 1603(b)(2), which addresses agencies and instrumentalities of foreign states and includes within that definition corporations that are majority-owned by foreign sovereigns. This almost certainly means that the Corporation is majority-owned by Country A, an inference with which the Corporation’s own arguments are consistent: as the court describes them, the Corporation’s argument would “completely insulate corporations majority owned by foreign governments from all criminal liability.” And under relevant case law, this ownership is almost certain to be direct, not through subsidiaries or other arrangements.

>Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA)

Now that's a law that needs to be changed. No corporation should be allowed to operate anywhere in the U.S. immune from criminal liability, period.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/part-IV/chapter-97

>>4389321

>>4389336

>… we were doing “there” work

aka cleaning up Hussein's & NoName's mess

>>4389202

Good morning.

Brilliant shot.

You too.

>>4389399

Well said. Nice meme.

>>4389398

And prayers to all the families of the soldiers who lost their lives.

Now it's time to take care of those involved in perpetuating that scum.

>>4389279

>then practically gets on his knees and begs him to reconsider his plea,

>>4389315

> Clearly a "guilty" plea is not what the judge wanted

Clearly. Timing of this indictment the day before sentencing in the same federal district of Alexandria a coincidence?

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-12-17/two-michael-flynn-associates-indicted-in-virginia-federal-court

>>4389461

Any idea whether the person who posted it is friend or foe?

>>4389718

It may connect to the secret filing discussed in the article in l.b. notables.

>>4389337

>>4388691 l.b.

>the appellant is a corporate entity (“the Corporation”) that is owned by a foreign country (“Country A”) and is seeking to quash a subpoena it received from a grand jury in an undisclosed criminal matter.

Everyone is assuming "Country A" is Russia, but it could be any country. Like Turkey for example.

>>4389492

Would make sense in this context, yes.

Could be worth going back into the old "there/their" tweets & see if the theory holds.

Nice thinking.

>>4389915

>They're "programmed" to respond to certain subjects w/ counter-attacks.

Predictable pre-packaged responses, yes.

Now consider that DJT knows their strategy & tactics more than we know about the strategy & tactics that they employ on this board.

>What is the purpose of a laser pointer?