>>4389211 (lb)

This is all well and good, and I'm happy that Aussies want to get active. But why the focus solely on the ABC. I agree that 'Auntie' particularly in the last few years has become entirely captive to the DS agenda, identity politics & pushing globalism (masquerading as interntionalism). But lets not forget that the degredation of her independence has come largely at the hands of a supposedly conservative government. Q has pointed out that this awakening is no more about left versus right than it is about white v black or male v female. So why focus & put yet more pressure on the last remaining taxpayer funded media outlet, when the monopoly of fairfax and newscorp dominate our print, radio and television lanscape? Surely no one is gonna try to convince me that the shit you get fed on the project is more objective than 4 corners? Not one of our newspapers is fit to wipe your ass with and you are going to go after the ABC as the 1st priority. I find that hard to swallow.

>>4390081

I'll just repeat that i don't think that the Libs and Labor are both too far to the left or right… i think they are both too far towards mercantilist globalism, survellance state fascism, bankster and media monopolies, thought control, political correctness….. versus individual and national sovereignty.

The idea that globalism is somehow left and personal/national sovereignty to the right politically is just propaganda. I don't buy into it. Politically i am left right out…lol But this fight shouldn't be about government funding of a single media organisation, it should be about Australians standing up to the handing away of out sovereignty to YUUUUGE multinational conglomerates that eat away daily at our privacy, and our civil liberties. It is a fight for SOVEREIGNTY

>>4390171

No… sorry. You are picking on the low hanging fruit. It is a soft target, and what will wind up happening is that folks who are on BOTH the left and the right and are unhappy about the continual undermining of the independence of the ABC will see this as just another assault by yellow vested weirdos on her. It will undermine the cause and be easily offered up to ridicule by the MSM.

Be far better served going down Macquarie Street and protesting in front of Parliament, or down to Martin Place and protesting in front of one of the big 3 bank monopolies. We need to be posing the question to politicians, why does over 70% of legislation pass through both Houses UNOPPOSED (because it HAS to be passed to honor our international agreements that undermine our sovereignty). We can't even dicatte or write our own laws anymore. Again, that addresses the issue of sovereignty. That is what this is about.

>>4390237

No… totally pro the yellow vests, just the real kind. You know the ones that actually confront & challenge government crawling into bed with globalists and surveillance tech giants… rather than some cucky try hard version that attempts to get attention by surrounding a bunch of ABC NPCs and challanging them to a doofus off..

>>4390268

Yes, i agree with you there… you are correct. I should properly be saying protecting what 'limited sovereignty' we do actually possess. But I'm not just speaking about national sovereignty i am also talking about the sovereignty of the natural born individual, and the fact that givernments are selling thatbout to these tech giants so we can all be surveilled, barcoded and herded our entire lives.

>>4390268

Oh by the way, if you really want to know what went on with Whitlam, look into a couple of ex US intelligence spooks involved with the Nugan Hand bank, and Adnan Khashoggi (yes indeed, uncle to that famous recently departed Khashoggi). Whitlam was aclassic DS setup involving not only the Queen but US & Aus intel as well.

>>4390281

Organise the protest outside the RBA and I'll be there with jingle bells on Anon.