>>4394703

Anytime I see Arizona and/or New Mexico mentioned, I think about tunnels and trafficking, because of this:

https://www.curbed.com/2015/1/9/10004040/jeffrey-epstein-property-real-estate-holdings

(Note: this Curbed article was my go-to bookmark for Epstein's property)

"In 1993, Epstein purchased a 7,500-acre ranch in Stanley, New Mexico, from the late former New Mexico governor Bruce King. He named the ranch "Zorro," and proceeded to build a 26,700-square-foot hilltop mansion that was once said to be the largest home in the state, and has been described as a "stone fortress." A 1995 article in The New Mexican said that Epstein's initial plans for the residence described a main house that "will be similar to a Mexican hacienda, with an open-air entry into a courtyard with high-ceiling hallways, stone columns and a central fountain. The living room will measure about 2,100-square-feet, larger than the average house in Santa Fe County. The home will have an elevator, eight bathrooms, four fireplaces and three bedrooms." According to more recent report, Epstein recieved a county permit to build a small airplane hangar and air strip on the ranch.

Epstein has been reported as saying his New Mexico home "makes the town house look like a shack." According to records accessed on Property Shark, the structures on the property were last appraised in 2013 at $18,186,406.

In the recent court filing in Florida, Roberts names Zorro Ranch as one of the place she was sexually abused by Epstein, as well as forced to have sex with Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz. The Last time Epstein made news in New Mexico, it was when it was revealed that he attempted to contribute to the reelection campaign of former Attorney General and gubernatorial candidate Gary King in 2006."

Epstein's Zorro Ranch in Stanley, New Mexico is about 7 hours across the border from north Phoenix, Arizona, according to Google maps.

>>4395098

APPLICABLE CODE SECTION:

(C) Limitation on administrative review.-Except as provided in subparagraph (B)(iii)(III), a removal order entered in accordance with subparagraph (A)(i) or (B)(iii)(I) is not subject to administrative appeal, except that the Attorney General shall provide by regulation for prompt review of such an order under subparagraph (A)(i) against an alien who claims under oath, or as permitted under penalty of perjury under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, after having been warned of the penal ties for falsely making such claim under such conditions, to have been lawfully admitted for permanent residence, to have been admitted as a refugee under section 207 , or to have been granted asylum under section 208 .

Sauce: https://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-29/0-0-0-5389.html

OK there's the verbage - need a lawfag to interpret in plain English please

I don't get the panic over a government shutdown. We've had tons of them.

https://www.infoplease.com/timelines/timeline-us-government-shutdowns