>>4405261 lb

The point was about respect for elders as those who contributed in impressive ways and thus deserved respect.

The argument is just as sound if we ALL claim those men as OUR ancestors.

You sidestepped it cuz muh equality feelz.

Marxist bullshit.

Namefagging is saying I deserve special treatment bc of my name.

Wasn't what I was doing.

Was countering the argument that age somehow confers authority/respect.

Which is a bastardization of the "respect elders" custom.

The boomers that abandoned the responsibility of elder functionality to stay forever teenage consumers aren't "elders."

Age only = experience if you spent your years doing something others find valuable.

I feel bad for boomers that spent their whole lives

chasing Jew self-gratifying pleasures,

but they don't get to just pop into the revolution

in Act III and claim "elder rights"

after the rest of us busted our balls our whole lives.

>>4405350

Not dividing, just being honest.

Boomers were attacking baker

for having an opinion.

I defended baker.

Seems more like being for solidarity

and free speech than dividing.

>We all know boomers fucked up.

Then why the heavy push back?

Why can't we occasionally comment

on how boomers fucked up

without this feels-downpour of

not-all-boomers?

>Move on to, or be called a divisionshill.

Go fuck yourself.

Since when do we care about namecalling?

Call me an anti-semite racist while you're at it.