>>4406026

If you read this letter attached, you'll see that the concern wasn't then, nor is it NOW the Freemasons as a whole. It was - as your picture indicates - about the infiltration/corruption of a "rogue" group of Freemasons.

https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/06-02-02-0435

>>4406210

Do you have a link to this?

>>4406250

I'm more curious than suspicious, atm.

>>4406329

I'm not trying to prove to myself that the abuses exist and thank you for the link.

I AM trying to work out if there's been a misinformation campaign.