I can’t find the first article

>>4409465

Thanks Q for putting us back on shaky ground, how are we supposed to stay on track when you post false articles?

>>4409514

I was just starting to feel good about this q movement again

>>4409551

I mean the earlier one

>>4409573

Could of used a better example this discredits himself not the journalist

I guess q could have been saying the meme was fake but this was poorly implemented he needs help in his team to run this by before posting because it can be taken as himself being fooled by fake news.

>>4409680

its the latter but implementation was confusing needs to be more 5:5

>>4409690

Maybe but is there any evidence of that?

>>4409725

I think that’s it but man was it confusing and wide open to wrong interpretation

Q might be too military minded and possibly needs publicity assistance on the team