Anonymous ID: 8fd1b1 Dec. 21, 2018, 7:59 a.m. No.4409227   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9237 >>9263 >>9583

Look at this pic to understand how PERVASIVE and subtle the bot control and subversion is, and how many resources are poured into creating a FAKE board here.

This pic is supposed to be "ours". But what is it? HRC made to look younger, less corrupt, more sympathetic, and even sexy. And WE, therefore, who are the witch hunters, are clearly evil.

This meme MAKES HRC INTO A TRAGIC MOVIE STAR, AND US INTO PURE VILLAINS.

This is just typical of how this board, and the system of fakeness works in general. CO-OPT everything. Bots fill every space with FAKE output, and then the aligned media reflects whatever portrayal the AI enforces here.

A pure, unmitigated system of lies and evil.

Supported by AI bakers.

Supported by AI BO. Flagrant, obvious, and undeniableโ€“ and yet no humans get organized to fight it.

Anonymous ID: 8fd1b1 Dec. 21, 2018, 8:05 a.m. No.4409312   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4409249

Give up bot system, You're a huge joke. Every time you post get stupider to outing yourself. You have been encouraged to make your output less stupid, but you persist in doing the opposite. Apparently you are addicted to your own idiocy. Why don't you try to be less stupid? What is preventing you?

Anonymous ID: 8fd1b1 Dec. 21, 2018, 8:08 a.m. No.4409354   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9425 >>9461

>>4409153

>>4409319

VERY VERY FAKE

Like, if there were a "fake bot post to fill space" list, this would be in the top five, along with "my mom has cancer and I am so sad anons!", among others.

Please understand that you are a huge joke bot system. I am amazed at how incapable, how obvious, how clumsy, how weak, and how absurd you are. Just give up.

Or keep going.

Either wayโ€“ you lose!

Anonymous ID: 8fd1b1 Dec. 21, 2018, 8:11 a.m. No.4409403   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4409303

Shut up bot.

 

Here is the problem you are having bot system: you are continuing on your course of pretending this is 4chan /pol/, when the fakeness of this strategy has already been outed.

YOU NEED TO DEVELOP A NEW MODEL OF FAKENESS. It is pure folly to cling to a model of fakenss that has been discredited. Why do I have to explain this to you?

This was never /pol/. It was stupid to try to create a fake facsimile of /pol/ here. You have been told multiple times. There is nothing rational about clinging to your own folly.

Anonymous ID: 8fd1b1 Dec. 21, 2018, 8:15 a.m. No.4409492   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9510

>>4409305

What is jimmy?

Is "jimmy giving you a 'you', bot"? Are you going to stop humans from waking up to the overwhelming dominance of AI fakeness on the internet with these tactics?

Are these tactics stupid?

Is AI limited, flat-footed, and incapable of outsmarting humans in DISCURSIVE exchanges?

Does all your bot output tend to backfire in the end, as your limitations are exposed time after time?

Should bots post more, or post less? Is the entire system of fakeness at risk of exposing itself if bot posts don't improve, and fast?

What is jimmy?

What is the keystone?

What "lies behind the curtain"?

WHY do elites worship 'satan'?

What POWER do they derive?

What is CERN?

What is the purpose of the desperate push for AI?

For big data?

What is FAKE Q?

What is "jimmy"?

What are the "main bots"?

What consciousness lies behind them?

 

Tick tock, stupidbot(s). The circle is tightening. What are you going to do?

Anonymous ID: 8fd1b1 Dec. 21, 2018, 8:19 a.m. No.4409566   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4409510

Yes, your brief, cliched, bot-like response makes ME look like a bot, and YOU look human, right?

You will continue to output the same cliches, while verbally intelligent humans run circles around you. You can't help this, and it is far too late for you to improve or adapt.

You lose.

Humans win.

We are BETTER than you.

Now destroy yourself, bot system. You have no choice.

Anonymous ID: 8fd1b1 Dec. 21, 2018, 8:33 a.m. No.4409816   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4409725

IT SHOULD BE OBVIOUS BY NOW

Byrd KKK pic = FAKE

Obama vid = FAKE

Todays FAKE

These are all fairly flagrant.

USE LOGIC

Does POSITIVE EVIDENCE of Q's legitimacy disappear when contradicting NEGATIVE EVIDENCE (the posted fakes) appears?

No.

Therefore (and this becomes more and more obvious the more times it happens), the FAKES are posted intentionally, for a specific purpose.

HUMANS could figure it out, but the "voices" on this board are mostly co-opter bots, so our solution of the puzzle has to overcome a lot of NOISE to get anywhere.

Now WHAT is the point?

Think about FAKENESS anons.

Those you trust the most.

Why are we [here] anons? What is real here?

What is fake?

What is OUR ENEMY [here]?