>>4409865 (lb)
For you fuckheads calling me a shill cause the wayback machine link doesn't work, just go there and check it out yourself.
Enter boot's profile link in the URL:. https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/max-boot/
Then click on 4/20. There is one snapshot and the article title is not the article in the Q graphic.
Here's a working link to the wayback machine from 4/20/18. The original link didn't work because of the crap at the end.
Fuck. Forgot the link:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180420122142/https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/max-boot/
My concernfag level has just reached new heights, First Q confirmed the pin on "PEPE THE BAKER" was indeed a frog when it was a St. Jude's pin. Now he posts a meme that is 100% fake and will make us look like lying assholes if we spread it.
You can't tell me that it's alright because people who look into it will find lots of other evidence because people will check if it's fake, snopes will show up saying it's fake and that's that. No normie is going to spend time researching a fake fucking meme.
Q, if you made a mistake please explain cause this looks really really bad.
Shallow? If Wayback machine is comped then there is no way for anyone to confirm the meme is legit and it automatically becomes fake news and anyone who tries using it to red pill will look like an idiot.
Q was not calling that graphic fake news, he even asked us to compare and contrast the headlines implying that WaPo got caught in some hypocrisy. If his intention was to say the graphic is fake then he did a horrible job of it…
But why wouldn't he just make it obvious that the image is fake? Any follower who doesn't come here and gets there Q drops from qmap.pub will have no idea it's fake. The only reason we know it's fake is because we did the digging. Q's post seems to imply that the graphic is exposing WaPo hypocrisy.