Anonymous ID: 87eed8 Dec. 21, 2018, 10:51 a.m. No.4411933   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1991 >>2014 >>2065

BAKER

NOTABLE

calling it because late in bread

 

Habbenings yesterday in the super secret case that shutdown the 5th floor of the Federal DC court…

 

"On Thursday [yesterday], the company filed a motion that is sealed from public view. The motion is nearly 4,000 words long, according to an entry on the appeals court website.

 

Two hours after that motion was filed, a judicial order was issued in the case. That order likewise is sealed."

 

sauce:

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/21/foreign-company-continues–battle-over-possible-mueller-subpoena.html?__source=fincont&par=fincont

Anonymous ID: 87eed8 Dec. 21, 2018, 10:55 a.m. No.4411991   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2014 >>2065

>>4411933

^^^moar on the super secret case that shutdown the 5th floor of DC Federal court last week

 

new SEALED filing yesterday could be request for en banc hearing…

 

Entities that lose an appeal heard by a panel of three judges can ask for a so-called en banc review of the case.

 

If that request is granted, a panel comprised of all of the judges of the appeals court would consider the arguments.

 

If the foreign company in this case is not granted en banc status, or if it loses at that stage, it could ask the U.S. Supreme Court to consider its case.

 

However, the high court is not required to take the case. And if the Supreme Court rejects the request, the appeals court’s decision would stand.

 

sauce:

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/21/foreign-company-continues–battle-over-possible-mueller-subpoena.html?__source=fincont&par=fincont