Anonymous ID: 29c1b8 Dec. 21, 2018, 12:21 p.m. No.4413160   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3207 >>3225 >>3231 >>3294 >>3343 >>3548 >>3602

>>4412989

lawfag here

prolly just released today voted on earlier

this was 100% expected as posted in prior notables - to remind anons

potus rule stated no asylum app EXCEPT at approved POE

that is clearly illegal and rightly so cuz congress law allowed for crossing as an ER (fleeing) so it would not be logical to punish someone who was fleeing for their life

so that means asylum can be souhgt by those who entered illegally - that is not new

so what?

prevent them entering illegally is the same answer and already in place

as this is inplace where do they now have to make their app?

at the POE

win -win

Anonymous ID: 29c1b8 Dec. 21, 2018, 12:26 p.m. No.4413228   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4413071

the former

nearly 100% of those in elected and appointed positions are resolute LIARS

its a requirement for entry

that has changed

full replacement will take time

Anonymous ID: 29c1b8 Dec. 21, 2018, 12:35 p.m. No.4413343   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3409

>>4413160

why 5-4? because 4 judges vote politically - the law is clear

to clarify - asylum is allowed where a person is being persecuted or is in danger - they FLEE to the US - under the law they are NOT required to stop at a POE to apply - they may enter cuz its supposedly a life threatening situation and would be unfair to expect to them to seek out a POE

THAT IS ALL THE COURT SAID

Anonymous ID: 29c1b8 Dec. 21, 2018, 12:46 p.m. No.4413468   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4413409

yes anon the law is not logical is it?

seems it might apply to mexican citizens only?

congress is very very bad

but its better the court does not fix it

let potus fix it the way the contsitution says