>>4413657 LB

>>4413683 LB

Nice thinking.

I notice the pen tweet showed up first, then the

44 tweet.

Follow the pen.

If you see a pen by one of Trump's people, follow?

Information coming soon after?

>>4413747

Teaching all to be careful, source everything?

Double check.

>>4413778

PEN signalling attack incoming?

Timing was weird, Trump / Grassley, minutes aprart.

Then Grassley post more info than he usually does.

Then you post this, mentions attacks.

Future will prove past?

So shills think Q is fake.

Then why are shills here?

Would you be here if you believed Q was fake?

So Q is real.

Thanks shills for proving Q.

>>4413834

Nothing happening?

2018 is glorious, compared to 2009?

>>4413905

A lot of left-ism going on there?

Maybe so much it doesn't make sense to us?

Maybe cheap shot at Q with queeg?

Def saying Trump ship going down, but Anons

know better who is winning.

Besides that, not much info.

Maybe in the book, but time better spent on

easier, more obvious corruption.

>>4413993

speaking of… haha

When political leaders disagree with Trump, do

you get suspicious?

Graham, Grassley, Mattis, are they playing roles?

I hate to imagine the alternative, but Graham

and NoName were seen together.

The old ones seem to be corrupt to me.

If they were there for that long, they know the

corruption, and never informed the People.

>>4414067

Thank you, Merry Christmas.

Oh yeah Q said "Trust Grassley"!!

So Grassley not comped, so tweeting for

Patriotic purposes.

He pretends to attack POTUS last tweet, why?

To bring attention to the conversation?

Red line, Obama, Taliban, Syria?

idk.

>>4414242

"Seems like" is right.

Q said trust Grassley so…

Anons seem to trust Mattis but idk him well.

If they are to be trusted and seem to turn on Trump, then they are playing a role, no?

If so, why are they playing a role?

What is their purpose?

Once figured out, we can help.

>>4414287

Thanks, do you think RUS will be any help with

that situation?

I'm pretty sure China won't.

>>4413993

Nice break down.

Could be something, might be nothing.

But pen, Grassley more information than usual

today, POTUS tweet, Schumer.

Lots of 'coincidences'.

>>4414340

Good point, I will keep 'trust' in mind.

>>4414340

In this case 'trust' before the name tells me to

'trust' that person, not the other kind of 'trust'.

>>4414370

I'm terrible at clock so I will leave that to you.

I gotta do stuff anyway so I will see you all later.

Thank you Anons.

You are brilliant and the World benefits.

The World is watching.