>>4417472 lb

Maybe they don't match because they are not the same.

What make you believe they are the same, and why would Q go through so much trouble to get the iPhone logo reversed?

I spent more time than you trying to debunk the image and I can't.

Reverse engineering the image highlighted many issues that can't be explained. The iPhone surface reflections is the biggest one.

The iPhone logo has to be completely disregarded to get as close as you did.

Q's photo is of an iPhone with AF1 in the reflection. Not a straight shot of the subject. That is why you need to reverse and distort the iPhone logo to kind of get them to match.

This .gif is clearly not the same image but is the same subject.

Not that hard to get two photos of the same thing to kind of match up.

The crystal piece near the lamp moves about 4 inches……… Why do you think they are the same?

KEK

>>4417775

Not even close it you care to look.

I like your digits more than mine.

I got hosed.

>>4417803

The debunking images came out so fast that I think option one is kind of correct. I think there is a good chance Q team was the first to present the debunking images.

There was a thick black border in the first round to hide the differences, but then was corrected soon after.

Q wanted these images to stay a debate in my opinion.

The shills bite at it every time because it is very scary to them. The best proof we have so far.

Trolling is fun.

>>4417955

Q's photo is correct, and not distorted. It is exactly what you would expect to see if you shot a photo on an iPhone at an angle inside AF1.

The distortion is only added to try and get it to match with other images.

Q chose us for a reason. This was a complex issue but I feel we passed this test.

>>4417955

There was no photoshop that I can find in Q photo.

The optical distortions created by the iPhone are very real.

There is no filter for that kind of light bending. 3DS max can't even ray trace that.

>>4418111

I'm with you Anon. This is a photo. Not a shoop.

I think it is important to bring up from time to time because NYT, and Fake News is lurking and I want them to remember that Q has access to AF1 and Trump's iPhone.

>>4418226

We don't agree on that.

This is a photo inside of AF1. Not distorted. Not Shooped.

Please try to recreate the image, and you will start to find the many issues.