Hey clockfags

there was been a lot of discussion, and even apparently arguments over what Q meant by the clock

THEORY: I want to see if we can recreate what Q meant in the 1/6/18 post with the current Qclock

or at least assess what Q meant by it

verbatim what I posted in general:

[Marker] = [something within the brackets]

made a graphic laying out all the [markers] before this post (pic1, 1/6/18) in chronological order

trying to see what the clock Q wanted is

ALL Q CRUMBS BEFORE "Wind the clock w/ all markers" with [markers]

there could be others not within brackets, but I stuck with all crumbs with them in it, including the [repost]s

*the only other reference to a clock was the a crumb saying "start the clock" referencing the 10 day clock for the 10 days of darkness from the 12/7/17 to 12/17/18, and since the crumb had no marker, I did not include it

plus, we need to "wind the clock w/ ALL MARKERS, so it doesn't make sense to start Q's clock on the 7th if there are clearly many markers before it

starts in the top left corner, a goes down chronologically, starting a new column for room

again, this is likely not all markers prior to 1/6/18, if not, point them out to me and I can add them chronologically like I have them

but signatures and stringers are distinctly different from makers

from general:

the anons' discussions about going back to the basics of the graphic, map, and clock had me thinking:

we can NOW go back and try to reconstruct what Q WOULD'VE meant back when it was posted, with two specific posts as guiders/milestones

1. the "wind the clock w/ all markers" for the clock

gather all markers prior to that post and see what we can do, with the Qclock or from scratch

1. the post with "43 confirmed connections"

we can track back from that post to see if we can find 43 "confirmed connections" to the map

started by gathering the markers, because not sure what to make of the connections and what defines tham

the markers are also ill-defined, but at least the bracketed ones can be ID'd easily

>>4773195

no problem

the december 7th date has always bothered me for these reasonings:

>the only other reference to a clock was the a crumb saying "start the clock" referencing the 10 day clock for the 10 days of darkness from the 12/7/17 to 12/17/18, and since the crumb had no marker, I did not include it

>we need to "wind the clock w/ ALL MARKERS, so it doesn't make sense to start Q's clock on the 7th if there are clearly many markers before it

I just wanted to do this experiment with both the clock and map to see what could be learned from it

I think we still have yet to unlock aspects of the clock as Q meant it

I've seen many amazing clock graphics and I still have doubts about it

my aim of this was just as a thought experiment and a good way to reread the early crumbs and refresh our understanding of what Q meant by the clock and map

(graphic is just the crumbs in order)

take your time to think about it, still thinking about how the markers prior to 1/6/18 relate to the clock

>>4773110

updated to add the lord's prayer crumb

oh, and what's the meaning behind the colors?

that's new, haven't heard the reasoning behind it yet from anyone

>>4774145

oh ok, that's interdasting actually

>4774283

>What is the ultimate purpose of the QClock?

exactly my question

It's unclear what it's true purpose is, it seems to be confirm FUTURE PROVES PAST by later confirming old crumb

but Q says to wind it with MARKERS, not timestamps, signatures, stringers, crumbs, or pics

I'm not saying the clock wouldn't be able to do with that those other things, I want to understand the pure use of it with the markers

which is why I think looking at all the markers before Q said to wind the clock with all markers would be a good way to further explain it's use and purpose

I think the Qclock is very close and useful, I'm just doing this as an experiment

>>4774513

similar to my thinking (sorry about the fucked up link)

>>4774629

I'll take a look at it

>>4774611

that's my point, by thinking about what Q wanted on 1/6/18, we can apply it to now

legitimately a year later

the current clock works, not trying to change it, just seeing what we can think off by doing this experiment/exercise

>>4774817

an example from my graphic of the markers

it has the [5] marker

>>4778534

that is not connected to Q at all, and is not the map

some artist made it

>>4783120

exactly shows the MAGNITUDE of the map and clock

there are so many variables

for example, like you indicate, it's hard to definitively know what exactly constitutes a 'marker'