Anonymous ID: bb68ec Dec. 21, 2018, 9:44 p.m. No.4420710   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0757

>>4420660

 

actually the odds are quite good, considering all post UIDs are reused every bread, and programmatic randomizers are really only pseudo-randomizers and a 6 place hex value isn't a very big pool.

 

So feel free to fuck right off :D

Anonymous ID: bb68ec Dec. 21, 2018, 10:10 p.m. No.4421006   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4420986

 

You are the anon making the claims.

 

The burden of proof also belongs to you ;)

 

If you've shown no work to rove your claims, I am under no obligation to show any reasoning behind calling bullshit on your unsauced bullshit

 

;D

Anonymous ID: bb68ec Dec. 21, 2018, 10:26 p.m. No.4421166   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1275

>>4421131

>Or people working directly for them as agents.

 

That's the way I view them; These are specific individuals.

 

Whether they [are] the person, or working for, is immaterial.

 

A human is there to psychologically attack.

Anonymous ID: bb68ec Dec. 21, 2018, 10:39 p.m. No.4421321   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1363

>>4421275

 

I don't think making threats is productive. Telling them they are fucked in creative ways is much more entertaining.

 

People leak far too much of their personal lives onto the internet. I think it's disgusting, frankly.