>>4422837 lb

I don't think they understand their own concept of Lucifer, very well, then.

I can understand why many would have difficulty processing a challenge to religious doctrine and how this led to secret societies in the first place - but to then play favorites just makes them a rival pantheon to the pantheon.

Now if one were to, say, publish the symbols and truth in the form of media fiction/art, then hint at it, that would be more fair to say that one is not playing favorites with the information, but is also trying to avoid being burned at the stake by Rah and Zeus worshippers.

Even so, that is kind of a stop-gap. Not to mention, the secret societies have kind of gotten caught up in their wars with religious institutions, forgetting the importance of who the gods were in the first place. Or… A fair number of them seem to have.

UFOs are a distraction, but blood lines matter and the skin of the gods is relevant.

Owls are the symbol of Minerva, Athena, and Lilith - and I doubt they are meant by Q to be entirely adversarial, yet as the guardians of knowledge, they can be held accountable for ignorance in many ways.

Of course… A lot of this is water under the bridge in a sense. The criminals are known by their deeds and most people are simply trying to carry out what is in their own interest and good, when seen as possible. Most people will not opt for something they understand to be evil, but will trend to what is first in their own interest when things are ambiguous or the cost of good far too high.

Speculating about the structures that have ruled over the past may be intriguing, and provide insight into how we got here, but it doesn't really pave the way forward, either. I don't really care by what name people call the concept of Divinity - but those who are guilty of killing others for it, those who are guilty of plotting to destroy the lives and works of good people - they are criminals that no rational person could support. I do not know which orders and individuals thereof hold that guilt - but that's what courts are for - to bring forth those accused with probable cause to face an evidence based trial that assumes no guilt until proven.

Although I will say… If owls are going to roost in my trees, the least they could do is eat the damned rats in the garden. Secret orders with powerful people supposedly for enlightenment and y'all let CNN happen. Was anyone awake at the wheel?

This is the part where I find out my dad was part of some kind of secret society and was being leveraged by the CIA along with many others who have been waiting for the right time to tell me. Or something. I've parsed a thousand scenarios and most end in "you're an alien" or otherwise rendered incompatible with society by genetics or psychosis. Naturally, I choose the one with the greatest potential for adventure-IforgotwhatIwastalkingabout.

>>4422967

Declas has already happened, I would argue. If I had to guess, POTUS signed an EO (the pen) that ordered the preparation of classified materials for use in court cases and then authorized declassifying them under court seal.

A blanket declas is/was unlikely. Even if it was ordered, it is unlikely documents would be served by the intelligence community. What is more likely is that we will be able to file FOI on court cases as they conclude to get better understanding, and eventually most redactions can be lifted.

The cinch of all of this will be the speed of court cases as the public is made aware that something very wrong has been taking place and the media can't be trusted. Once that initial threat of protest and uprising has been defused, everything will move swiftly. And we'll mostly be trying to catch up with all of the names who have been detained or processed already in court proceedings still under seal.

>>4423023

Keep in mind how the DS works. Q's use of shopped yellow-vests for Q seems, to me, to be a way of getting us to place ourselves in their shoes. Many suggested that Q was trying to get us to organize and protest in a similar manner - but not only is that not the nature of the board in the first place, it's also prone to infiltration and provocation - the tactic of the deep state.

I think it's a bit of a warning to suggest that "this could be you." And, in a sense, is. Where we go one, we go all - we have our own infiltrators and provocateurs.

>>4423059

In the cosmic side of things, the Solstice usually falls on the 21st, when the Earth's orbit is at apogee - the point of lowest velocity and effectively reaching zero. It is during this time when the sun appears to rise in the same place for three days. Depending on exactly how you slice it, that goes from the 21st to the 24th. Or 25th. You would have to really stretch things to go to the 26th.

This is "the pale horse" - death - of Revelations. It's a cycle of life, the 4 horsemen. Blue/green, red, black, and pale. You can extend this out to much longer cycles, but it's more likely that revelations, itself, was using the common depiction of the seasons' cycle to illustrate the concept of death and rebirth of the world from a spiritual sense.

>>4423163

You know… Something has been bothering me a bit.

Q said that he heard Lynn was having trouble sleeping.

We see in a later drop that Q says "those who know (good) can't sleep."

Assuming that Q is not excepting Lynn from this statement, and that his initial exchange with her was also genuine - we are at a bit of a conundrum that begs some explanation. Perhaps I am just a softiefag who likes to believe everyone is an innocent victim - but perhaps we have LDR's position in this confused.

Not that it would matter to most, but I can't help but wonder if a number of these people are just in over their heads and no longer know how to get off the crazy train.

>>4423246

Then why would Q, knowing what he is going to say about good people not being able to sleep, go out of his way to carry on something of a skit with her including that line?

I'm not saying she is a delightful individual. I am simply thinking logically. If those who know (good) can't sleep and Lynn is unable to sleep… With no other factors to input - we are left with that as the only defined case.

A run down also reveals that we assumed it was LDR. Q only referred to her as Lynn, as far as I recall. Were we wrong in assuming it was LDR?

Is there another set of statements which point to his skit with Lynn?

>>4423318

I was there.

I also ascribe to Q an intelligence worthy of contemplation. Anons here are constantly blown away by Q's ability to interleave posts and meanings months and years apart, yet want to run with confirmation bias at the first sign. Either Q is intelligent enough to know exactly what he is doing as he is doing it, or he is not. I expect him to be able to build his own map and message and that such "coincidences" are quite deliberate.

But, we digress from productive talk.

>>4423393

The confirmation bias is so strong it's adorable.

It's no wonder they see you as useful tools. For their part, the shills do have a point when they suggest you're dogs to another lap.

I'm now bored.

Dogs are being a bit snippy.

You are not wrong for trusting a plan… But why have you chosen to trust a plan?

The defensive, visceral reactions posed by many is an indicator of an underdeveloped sense of one's own standpoint. You can't handle criticism or questions because you, yourself, hold only blind faith.

Even if that is faith in a good thing and faith in something I support - it is still woefully inadequate and insulting to sentience.