Multiple meanings of Q post? "Trump can't do anything right - we don't need troops in Syria", the date Apr 19 (yr?), the author Max Boot … why are these elements cobbled together?
-Max Booth (WaPo/clown author)…his writings about Syria appear to be be about "protecting Israel" from the Arabs and he changes his position of what Trump should do very often
-
Max Boot writing is typical MSM, most everything he spouts is anti-Trump
-
The article he wrote on Dec 7th (Pearl Harbor Day) included part of the title "Trump can't do anything right…"
That article said Nixon was never proven to have ordered the crime, Bill Clinton impeached trying to cover up his indiscretion, and more importantly:
Mueller has no evidence of a POTUS crime, and is unlikely to get any evidence of a crime…but (((they))) will nail him with "obstruction of justice"
Is this one of the things Q wanted us to see? The Demon-crat narrative going forward? Look for this deep state theme after the holidays: Nixon-Clinton-Trump comparison?
The other thing I've taken away from this is that Israel is the prime benefactor of the US being in Syria and may be pulling the behind-the-scenes fuckery to keep us there
IMO: 1) Khashoggi, 2) MBS, 3) Yemen, 4)Lindsey Graham, 5) Syria are all one big DS move [1-4] - POTUS countermove [5]
IMO: DS trying to drive wedge between US-Saudi (Khashoggi/MBS & Yemen), Trump responds with pulling US troops from Syria and replace with MBS/Saudi troops (to protect Israel from the Kurds?) See what POTUS did there? I'm sure Israel got the message 5:5
Any thoughts?