>>4428673

You know that's not a photograph, right?

>>4428740

I bet that guy thought he was going to be in a really boring movie when he was doing that scene.

>>4428877

These date ranges don't actually take cultural evolution into account.

Someone born in 1986 had a very, very, very different childhood than someone born in 1996.

These terms are all just horseshit for dumb people

>>4428918

>they're used to discuss generational differences, which are completely valid and need to be talked about and understood so we can learn from them, and not repeat the mistakes and continue what was good

Agree on your last point, but the terms and date ranges we have are still really inadequate, arbitrary and I only generally see really simple people using the terms and standing by their stereotypical associations.

So….I still think we could do much better sociologically

>>4428953

It's a copy and pasted "joke"

It's been around years and years and it's not funny

>>4428962

Reductionist stereotypes harm our ability to view the past clearly.

I agree again :)