>>4428357 (lb)
a) you're a namefag and a faggot.
b) no sauce, ergo, you're a faggot.
c) used term 'wonder if it is a hoax' ← definitely a faggot.
will taunt for sauce
maybe if you weren't a psyop to discredit the board, people might like you better. as it is, we think you're absolute shit.
I missed those and have been hoping someone would post some more. They're great. Thank you, anon.
sssllliiidddeee
anyone rushing in making huge claims like that without ANY sauce is 99% bullshit. I could sense it immediately (and called it out above.)
>maybe false alarm
MAYBE? Saying CNN is reporting implies anon SAW it. Not false alarm, intentional time-wasting slide.
my sides
now THAT's moar like it!
>1) I saw anon's claim of seeing it on CNN at the end of LB.
>2) I posted that anon's claim on this bread with a call to dig, b/c important if found to be true.
>3) I have no personal knowledge of the alleged incident. I don't have a TV and I don't watch CNN.
>4) I retracted the alarm when anons thought it was a slide and I could not substantiate the rumor with my RSS breaking news feeds.
>5) It's still newsworthy IF found to be true. Needs sauce.
Prudent suggestion:
1) see namefag. immediately insult because they're cancer.
2) see claim. check claim. when false, ignore and move on.
3) if not false, make sauce and post it INCLUDING SAUCE. NOT AS A NAMEFAG.
4) profit.
>Bye!
don't let the glork hit you on the whey uit.
i guess she took the 5th…
welcome, newfaggot.
dershowitz is part of the plan to educate the masses.