>>4428357 LB
DIG DIG DIG !!!
Diggers scramble! (wrong pic)
I searched all my breaking news RSS feeds and didn't find anything. Now we have a new graphic to alert diggers when something urgent habbens, though.
No TV, no CNN here.
1) I saw anon's claim of seeing it on CNN at the end of LB.
2) I posted that anon's claim on this bread with a call to dig, b/c important if found to be true.
3) I have no personal knowledge of the alleged incident. I don't have a TV and I don't watch CNN.
4) I retracted the alarm when anons thought it was a slide and I could not substantiate the rumor with my RSS breaking news feeds.
5) It's still newsworthy IF found to be true. Needs sauce.
Bye!
Memes Unity together strong
baker could be notable
>>4428578 Sealed filing to Chief Justice Roberts, appeal of an In Re Grand Jury Subpoena case
Correction. The SCOTUS appeal asks for a Stay of an appeals court ruling.
Reporting of altitude is a feature of the transponder that the pilot can turn on or off at will.
>>4428496 Agree.
see my post >>4426821 pb with the framecaps & text from that video
Re_read the speech that will get Donald Trump elected >>4426906 and view the images.
>>4426821 , >>4426831 , >>4426836
>>4426887 pb
I said,
> To me, the most salient part was Trump's direct accusation against the Clintons.
>She should be locked up
>"They will do whatever is necessary. The Clintons are criminals; remember that. This is well documented."
>And talking about the establishment that protects them, widespread criminal activity at the State Department and Clinton Foundation in order to keep the Clintons in power.
>Hillary and Clinton Foundation never sued Trump for defamation. Meaning the allegations are true and cannot be defended.
>Anons knew that from before the election, of course.
>But the general public should also know it now.
>It can be pointed out to normies.
Trump would have been sued for defamation by now, if the Clintons dared to try and refute Trump's statement that they are criminals and should be locked up.
What's the statute of limitations for a defamation suit? He obviously was not afraid of getting sued. He already had the documentation of their crimes and knew they did not dare risk a suit and discovery in a defense of a defamation action.
Frens are united.