Anonymous ID: 3eedb6 Dec. 22, 2018, 3:11 p.m. No.4429166   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9201 >>9202 >>9237 >>9260 >>9293 >>9405 >>9624 >>9823

An interesting backstory and subplot to what's going on…

 

▪How arrest of Chinese ‘princess’ exposes regime’s world domination plot▪

 

Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou’s arrest in Vancouver on Dec. 6 led to immediate blowback.

 

Furious Chinese Communists have begun arresting innocent Canadians in retaliation. So far, three of these “revenge hostages” have been taken and are being held in secret jails on vague charges. Beijing hints that the hostage count may grow if Meng is not freed and fast.

 

Even for a thuggish regime like China’s, this kind of action is almost unprecedented.

 

So who is Meng Wanzhou?

 

Currently under house arrest and awaiting extradition to the US, she will face charges that her company violated US sanctions by doing business with Iran and committed bank fraud by disguising the payments it received in return.

 

But to say that she is the CFO of Huawei doesn’t begin to explain her importance — or China’s reaction.

 

It turns out that “Princess” Meng, as she is called, is Communist royalty. Her grandfather was a close comrade of Chairman Mao during the Chinese Civil War, who went on to become vice governor of China’s largest province.

 

She is also the daughter of Huawei’s Founder and Chairman, Ren Zhengfei. Daddy is grooming her to succeed him when he retires.

 

In other words, Meng is the heiress apparent of China’s largest and most advanced hi-tech company, and one which plays a key role in China’s grand strategy of global domination.

 

Huawei is a leader in 5G technology and, earlier this year, surpassed Apple to become the second largest smartphone maker in the world behind Samsung.

 

But Huawei is much more than an innocent manufacturer of smartphones.

 

It is a spy agency of the Chinese Communist Party.

 

How do we know?

 

Because the party has repeatedly said so.

 

First in 2015 and then again in June 2017, the party declared that all Chinese companies must collaborate in gathering intelligence.

 

“All organizations and citizens,” reads Article 7 of China’s National Intelligence Law, “must support, assist with, and collaborate in national intelligence work, and guard the national intelligence work secrets they are privy to.”

 

All Chinese companies, whether they are private or owned by the state, are now part and parcel of the party’s massive overseas espionage campaign.

 

Huawei is a key part of this aggressive effort to spy on the rest of the world. The company’s smartphones…cont.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/tech/how-arrest-of-chinese-princess-exposes-regimes-world-domination-plot

Anonymous ID: 3eedb6 Dec. 22, 2018, 3:22 p.m. No.4429293   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9305 >>9624 >>9823

>>4429166

 

More on Huawei….

 

▪Former CIA chief has seen “hard evidence” of Huawei spying on behalf of China▪

 

Michael Hayden, who used to head the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency and is also a retired United States Air Force general, said in an interview with Australian Financial Review (AFR) that Huawei had shared “intimate and extensive knowledge” of the telecommunications infrastructure it is involved in with the Chinese government.

 

AFR also reported that General Hayden has seen “hard evidence” of spying activity performed by Huawei, the world’s second largest telecom equipment manufacturer, on behalf of the Chinese government.

 

Hayden is on the Board of Directors of Motorola Solutions (the part of Motorola that Google did not buy) and it has been in ongoing intellectual property disputes with Huawei for years. Hayden also said that he was approached by Huawei to join its American Board, but “God did not make enough slides on Huawei to convince me that having them involved in our critical communications infrastructure was going to be OK. This was my considered view, based on a four-decade career as an intelligence officer.”

 

Huawei’s Global Security Officer and former UK Government official, John Suffolk, issued a statement saying that the allegations were “tired” and challenged Hayden or anyone to present evidence, “It’s time put up or shut up.” However, Hayden says that Huawei has fallen short of passing any litmus test to convince him otherwise, “These guys are not even transparent to themselves. There’s no transparency around who appoints the board or who controls the ownership of the business. And there’s no independent Chinese government oversight committee that could give us confidence that Huawei would not do what they promised not to do.”

 

It is a significant blow to Huawei, having a high-profile individual “in the know” publicly state mischievous activities and claim that evidence exists to back it up. It also…cont.

 

https://www.phonearena.com/news/Former-CIA-chief-has-seen-hard-evidence-of-Huawei-spying-on-behalf-of-China_id45500

Anonymous ID: 3eedb6 Dec. 22, 2018, 3:33 p.m. No.4429405   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4429166

 

▪Huawei faces catastrophe in the technology cold war▪

 

(((If the US can prove the Chinese firm broke sanctions, Huawei could grind to a halt)))

 

Charles Arthur

 

Thu 6 Dec 2018 07.51 EST

 

The arrest in Canada of the chief financial officer of the Chinese mobile network and handset tech firm Huawei marks a new stage in a technological cold war between western spy agencies and Beijing. This development could be catastrophic for Huawei: according to reports, the US suspects it broke sanctions by selling telecoms equipment to Iran. If that is proven, the response could exclude Huawei from many of the world’s most valuable markets.

 

That quiet war of words had already begun to ramp up this week when first the head of the UK’s secret service, Alex Younger, said in a speech that “we need to have a conversation” about Huawei’s involvement in the UK’s telecoms network. Then on Wednesday, BT revealed it is stripping out Huawei’s networking kit from parts of the EE mobile network.

 

Huawei has been the world’s largest telecoms network equipment company since 2015, ahead of European rivals Ericsson and Nokia, and far above domestic competitor ZTE and South Korea’s Samsung.

 

But the company has for years struggled against suspicions that it has bowed to pressure from the Chinese government to tap or disrupt telecoms systems in foreign countries. That has seen it (((banned from selling its profitable network equipment to the US, Australia and New Zealand – three of the “Five Eyes” group of intelligence-sharing countries))) (the other two being the UK and Canada)….cont.

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/technology/2018/dec/06/huawei-faces-catastrophe-in-the-technology-cold-war