>>4433821

Think critically…

So, you believed everything Q said at face value without applying logical thinking?

… That's right - logical thinking, not critical thinking.

Critical thinking has its value, but is focused on exposing contradictions in a structure. It's an analytical tool, but only one within a much larger kit.

Good job, you found a hole in Q's structure. You now assume the hole not only compromises integrity, but also that Q somehow placed it there in error or by malevolent intent.

These are not logical assumptions to base new reasoning on, given the context and pattern of Q.

The flaw in your thinking is that anons are somehow not aware of these issues, or that they are "blindly following" in totality. And I can be extremely harsh/judgmental of anons who love to assume every challenge to them is a shill.

As such, you may or may not be a shill, but I will explain the deficiencies of your presentation in the hope that you will be able to improve upon yourself. Perhaps one day we can be frens. Or frenemies.

Or not. It doesn't really bother me all that much either way.

>>4434066

Anon, you're kind of stupid if you think I am concerned with your evaluation of things. Here, let me get some words your group will remember:

"Nothing you can ever conceive of exists outside of what I have already thought. You are a subset of my own thoughts, and one I have deemed of limited utility."

Simply because I support Q and the anons supporting him does not mean it is my only plan or project. I have a mission, Q as true or not true. Q simply offers the potential to achieve that goal far more efficiently. As such, I welcome the idea. But I am more than willing to deal with things personally. I just don't have the positioning to be as clean or ideal about it.

Which also means I do see what Q has done, and see no real reason to go OFP. If you want to get hung up on such details as who the full declas was given to (the courts), that's your call, but I've already considered everything you can consider, and see no further reason to continue this dialogue.