>>4433741

Remember the 'real' (unredacted, 'unaltered by RR') IG Report we were supposed to lobby for but never got (because it doesn't exist)?

How about the tarmac audio that was supposed to demonstrate Lynch's corruption and DOJ collusion with the Clinton campaign?

Shit like that would break the deep state the MOMENT it was released……….

How does Q's abandonment of these vitally important claims not sow seeds of doubt within this community??

And Q tells you to think critically……what a fucking embarrassment.

>>4433826

see

>>4433821

>>4433867

If it's been referenced here, why the FUCK would it be admissible anyways?

>>4433867

And your unquestioning obedience to an entity that never delivers is genuinely alarming.

How far are you willing to let empty claims drive you?

>>4433929

so let's train ourselves to deny any official statement that goes against our misconceptions of what's actually happening…genius.

>>4433940

You're worried about 'proper timing' when the DS is running roughshod while conservatives merely pretend they have power…

>>4433975

Wow, hell for doubting in this.

You're one of the idiots who is going to pick up a gun when you finally allow yourself to engage in doubt.

>>4434020

LOL doubt is proof of Q being genuine? I used to want to believe…only when I expect results (something you find abhorrent because of 'timing') I became a 'shill'…

You've got some serious hoops you're jumping through in your head to justify this shit.

>>4434043

I took Q at their word. That was a mistake, huh?

How much actual, dairy farm bullshit are you willing to eat before someone tells you it's bad for you?

>>4434103

>Oh Great One!

Isn't that idolatry?

>>4434105

My 'job' so far as you're concerned is looking for the fucking TRUTH.

And wishing someone an unimaginably painful hereafter in hell for eternity over a disagreement concerning a matter you can't prove is about as childish as a human behavior gets….so congratulations for climbing that summit.

"and looking for truth consists of concernfagging on a board u think is all bs anyways?"

I came to the place where Q posts to ask why no one seems to give a shit that Q never comes through….and that's overboard for you??

Listen, your emotionally charged argument makes the weak reasoning you possess about as obvious as you can without admitting it.

And yes, you're repeated the 'glowing' shit. Your vernacular doesn't make the claim that I'm somehow paid to do this (LOL) any more valid.

>>4434226

Yes, many times. Most recently, D5, in case you forgot.

"I have a mission, Q as true or not true."

You simply reject how others approach the same problem. Understood.

rolls eyes so damn hard

>>4434303

>"I have a mission, Q as true or not true."

You simply reject how others approach the same problem. Understood.

rolls eyes so damn hard

>>4434373