Hey, I'm the one who was arguing with you the other night in the general thread about ELF. It's probably easier to carry out the conversation in here where things are moving more slowly.
I think the ELF link is a red herring, for a number of reasons. Firstly, using microwaves from a satellite as a carrier for a low frequency signal wave does not create an actual ELF wave, it creates a variation in the intensity of the microwaves. This is used for data transmission, but it doesn't create the same thing physically speaking. It wouldn't penetrate any further than a regular microwave, since it is simply a microwave that is varying in intensity.
ELF waves would be very poor for detection of something as small as a submarine. More likely they were using other mechanisms for submarine detection. I'm not qualified to speculate on what those would be.
ELF waves also have insufficient bandwidth for transmitting sufficient data for something like mind control. It is possible that ELF waves effect mood, but delivery of detailed instructions seems exceedingly difficult.
With respect to MKULTRA, trauma based mind control, and SSRIs, I am of the opinion that there are two levels of this. The first level is what is applied to the general public. The general idea of trauma based mind control, on the simple mass level, is essentially to shut down certain mental pathways and make some thoughts "unthinkable." The most effective way to do this is to have a thought linked to a period of extreme physical or psychological discomfort as a child. In the mass population case, this comes from exposing very young children to graphic accounts of the holocaust. A 7 year old child has no way of processing information about something like the holocaust, and so it causes them extreme psychological discomfort. When this is coupled with the guilt ridden "never again" ideas that are included in most holocaust education, you form a deep seated, early seed of guilt and shame in the child. Any attempt to think about this later on will recall these traumatic feelings and memories and cause the person's mind to shut down even in adulthood. "If I think this bad thing, I'll be a scared helpless child again being told how awful I am for existing."
After this base anchor has been established, additional layers of programming can be added on which essentially "call back" to this reference. By associating something else - say gun rights - with "evil right wing thought that literally gasses 6 million Jews" you establish a mental link that prevents considering the idea. This is why you hear so many of the leftists yelling "YOU'RE LITERALLY HITLER!". It's also why if you use certain words in explaining an idea, your listener simply shuts down - but if you avoid that "trigger" word they will consider your point. It is the same reason that the communist genocides, which by any metric were more brutal, do not engender the same level of emotion in most people. The Holodomor, or the mass starvation of 7 million Ukrainians, Russians, and Belorussians by the mostly Jewish run NKVD (~85%) in 1933 is a great example of this. Your mind reacted more strongly to me calling out the NKVD as Jewish than to the idea of 7 million people being starved to death deliberately. This is a crude system, and imprecise - but for the masses it has been very effective in keeping the population from ever questioning the narrative they are fed. To overcome this requires addressing the childhood trauma and overcoming it. This is why the left was fighting to impose "trigger warnings" - by preventing "triggers" from being present in the general world, it would remove the ability of people to become desensitized and then overcome the programming. Any (real, honest) psychologist will tell you that the way to overcome trauma is to confront it, not to pretend it never happened and stick your fingers in your ears.