>>4437350 (german bread)
https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pamphlets.html
Library of Congress Miltary Legal Resources
https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/DA-PAM_27-7_06-1985.pdf Guide for Summary Court–Martial Trial Procedure
https://jsc.defense.gov/
New Manual for Courts-Martial 2019
https://jsc.defense.gov/Portals/99/Documents/2019%20MCM%20(Final-Digital%20Publishing).pdf Manual
https://jsc.defense.gov/Portals/99/Documents/MCM%202019%20-%20Supplementary%20Materials.pdf
https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/DA-PAM_27-173_12-1992.pdf
Trial Procedure Department of the Army Pamphlet 27-173
Chapter 8-1. (1) (b) , Page 40
Law of war. General courts-martial have the power to try all persons made subject to military jurisdiction by the laws of war.
General courts-martial also have the power to: try any person … for any crime or offense against …
[t]he law of the territory occupied as an incident of war or belligerency
whenever the local civil authority is superseded in whole or in part by military authority of the occupying power.
8.1. (2) Place of Trial
In Durant the defense contended that the court lost jurisdiction by leaving Germany and convening temporarily in Washington, D.C..
An Army Board of Review held that the court's leaving the command of the convening authority did not deprive it of jurisdiction. 14
Has anyone discovered a paragraph in the current 2019 version that contradicts the above? Specifically: Is the above still valid?
If so: Merry Christmas.
USA occupies Germany. Military law takes precedence over the other law. I particularly like the death penalty.
(There however passages were deleted - I am not yet on quotable info stand)