Anonymous ID: dd5a29 Dec. 23, 2018, 7:58 a.m. No.4438431   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8498

Mary Poppins II

SPOILER ALERT!

Lots of parallels to habbenings…

 

Evil Bankers trying to steal the house of a vulnerable family (wife died).

 

The house will not be seized if the family can prove they own shares in the bank.

 

Attorneys/Bankers conspired to hide records/evidence that would save the house

 

The family lives at

17

Cherry Tree Lane

 

Is this the movie Q alluded to? Dumbing it down for the masses?

 

[MOVIES 1-3 FULL LIST].

Coming SOON to a theater near you.

MOVIE 2 – Coming this FALL.

MOVIE 3 – TBA

Enjoy the show.

Q

Anonymous ID: dd5a29 Dec. 23, 2018, 8:08 a.m. No.4438542   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8589 >>8943 >>9096

BAKER

NOTABLE

>>4438477 SDNY USA Berman digg

 

^^^^Berman was confirmed by

<FEDERAL JUDGES

NOT

<SENATE

 

sauce:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/25/nyregion/geoffrey-berman-us-attorney-manhattan.html

 

With No Nomination From Trump, Judges Choose U.S. Attorney for Manhattan

 

Exercising a seldom-used power, the judges of the Federal District Court in Manhattan voted unanimously on Wednesday to appoint Geoffrey S. Berman as the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, according to a court statement.

 

Mr. Berman was appointed interim United States attorney in January, and his 120-day term was due to expire next week. With no one yet nominated by President Trump for the Southern District position, the judges acted to fill it with Mr. Berman.

 

Under federal law, he will now serve until the Senate confirms a nominee by President Trump, whose administration has been slow to fill many posts in the executive and judicial branches.

 

About 40 judges were eligible to vote on Mr. Berman’s appointment, according to a court list. Many of the judges had once served as Southern District prosecutors, as had Mr. Berman, who worked in the office from 1990 to 1994.

Anonymous ID: dd5a29 Dec. 23, 2018, 8:38 a.m. No.4438885   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8893

>>4438847

>Does this mean the Fed is servant to the Cabal?

All connected…

 

Dec 14 2017 21:43:38 (EST)

Shall we play a game?

Find the spider(s) and build the web (the ‘map’).

Remember, they consider you to be the fly (specifically, the ‘feeder’).

Remember, they never thought she was going to lose.

Therefore, they never thought investigations and/or public interest into their criminal acts would be exposed/investigated.

Therefore, they never thought they had anything to fear.

Therefore, they openly showcase their symbolism.

Therefore, they were sloppy.

Hussein’s last speech in Chicago re: ‘scandal free’.

Why did he continually emphasize that phrase?

As a backup, they infiltrated and control the narrative (the ‘MSM’).

As a backup, they install only those on the team.

As a backup, they blackmail those that aren’t.

As a backup, they defined ‘conspiracy’ as crazy/mentally unstable and label anything ‘true’ as such.

This works given most of what they engage in is pure evil and simply unbelievable (hard to swallow).

The ‘fix’ has always been in – no matter which party won the election (-JFK (killed)/Reagan(shot)).

This was always the promise made to those who played the game (willingly or otherwise) (i.e., they would never lose power).

Power of the (3) letter agencies.

Power over the US Military (WW dominance to push against other nations and install like-kind).

These people are really stupid.

Follow the husbands.

Another Hint:

Ian Cameron

McKinsey & Company

Clowns In America.

Dr. Emmett J. Rice.

Federal Reserve.

Everyone is connected.

How about a nice game of chess?

Q

Anonymous ID: dd5a29 Dec. 23, 2018, 8:47 a.m. No.4438986   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4438930

>Again I ask, how in the world would anybody not part of the prosecutor's office or the grand jury itself (sworn to secrecy) know whether or not a certain witness has been interviewed?

The attorneys for the whistleblowers know whether or not their whistleblower has testified to grand jury.

Anonymous ID: dd5a29 Dec. 23, 2018, 8:52 a.m. No.4439049   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4438930

>Also, suppose they are going to use NSA evidence or documentary evidence…in that case prosecutors don't need witness testimony?

Agreed! They are following the money and bank transactions speak for themselves - no witness testimony needed.