>>4442345

By the way, despite what I said about the 5G handwriting not having credible sauce…

…we do not use a cellphone in or around our home

…we do not have WiFi turned on within our home

…we try to limit our exposure to unknown RF radiation sources

…I left bigcompany right before they began a company-wide deployment of wireless networking technology

This is mainly out of an abundance of caution, since credible hard facts are hard to come by.

I hope we get some hard data about 5G.

I was not arguing that it is safe … only that the "sauce" provided made several people look ignorant.

>>4442586

typo

>handwriting

correction

• hand-wringing*

>>4442614

Doesn't need to be Global Notable forever.

Can remove now IMO.

Anons?

BAKER - notable?

>>4442628 Christopher Steele Dossier Official PDF Files

Original source material for further digging

>>4442685

Also on the same principle as regularly changing passwords and crypto keys, if there are untrusted or partially-trusted individuals who have an opportuntity to manually hand one-time pads or crypto keys or encryption instructions to foreign parties, by changing those people out of the administration regularly it is analogous to changing your password. Maybe they exchanged a comms protocol but their access to classified and insider info has been removed.

>>4442849

I'm thinking of the people leaving the administration of course … Mattis … … …

You're talking to me.

>>4442933 see >>4442586

Don't misunderstand my point LB: I don't condone any sort of intrusion into the EM space in which I live.

But if you're going to fight it, you have to fight it with facts not hype.

Do the math. If the cells are 1000' in diameter, the power level required in each individual cell can be much lower.

How large are the cells with 3G & 4G?

What is the measured RF power level at different frequencies?

What will it be at the frequencies expected for 5G?

Need FACTS to refute with.