>>4443203

>Why limit the "cells" in question to human cells?

The "cells" I was speaking of are the regions with a cellular antenna in the center, that transmit/receive cellular comms and are interconnected by high-speed fiber links. You used the word "cells" and said with 5G they are 1000' in diameter. That was the context.

The problem with previous studies of WiFi and cellular radiation on biological living tissue is that the studies generally only considered one transmission at a time. In reality, ALL the transmissions arriving at a location in space overlap, with constructive & destructive inference, also creating intermodulation cross-products which can be calculated as the sum, difference, product, etc. of all the impinging frequencies.

Don't let them get away with studying just one transmission in isolation, because that's not reality.

>>4443377 good poster, anon

>>4443602

the 'glork' is just another kind of namefag.

I completely ignore it, and if it starts bugging me, I got a NOPE button.

>>4443619

>>4443697

All I can say is that with what I know now, I don't care to listen to either of them, having listened to each of them in the past.

>>4443446 Next phase of the movie begins 1/1/19? New tribunal rules kick in on that day, with a new cast of characters replacing Mattis, Kelly & Dunford. Would love to see perp walks begin prior to a bogus Congress being seated.