>>4443290 Guess that means that McGurk won't be missed except by his adoring media scabs.

>>4443329 Frankly, I'm not getting it, Champ. Seems there are many possibilities and variables. Why don't you explain it for those of us that are less prescient than you.

>>4443321 C'mon guys. You sound like a bunch of worried little girls. There is already so much RF out there that we should all be damaged or dead by now. We aren't because none of it is ionizing.

>>4443446 It occurs to me that for proper optics it will require that UCMJ prosecution of big wheels must be done by big wheels. Could it be that Kelly and Mattis are being preped to prosecute some big wheels?

>>4443441 Fire Powell then put the dollar back on some form of precious metal(s) standard. Destroys the FED.