>>4442933 PB 5G Issues and law.

>>4443011

>Do the math. If the cells are 1000' in diameter, the power level required in each individual cell can be much lower.

>How large are the cells with 3G & 4G?

>What is the measured RF power level at different frequencies?

>What will it be at the frequencies expected for 5G?

>Need FACTS to refute with.

Exactly. However. I would add one or two more questions.

1) Why limit the "cells" in question to human cells? All cells of all living things that will be effected, like plant cells that to photosynthesis and birds… other mammals need to be taken into consideration.

2) We have the right to demand the equipment to test it for ourselves so we do not have to take anyone's word for it. This stuff is not rocket science. I don't want to hear any "trade secret" crap.

3) Even if the starting communication frequency is safe, is that equipment capable of changing to a frequency that is NOT safe. We would need to make sure it can not do that, always.

4) The legal issues I bring up are to make sure anons understand that corporations do not have more rights than humans. HUMANS have the rights, and corporations have none, even if the corrupt Supreme Court attempted to tell everyone otherwise. This can be fought on Constitutional grounds. The states have always been capable of outlawing corporations completely if they so choose.

5) For all we know, we may find out that 5G is great, because it does something weird that is a benefit. Think of the way the sun causes our cells to make vitamin D for instance.

I am not against technology.

I am against technology loosed on a population that was told they are too stupid to do the research and "just trust us" and "muh trade secrets"

I am for remembering that corporations can be put back in place by simply re-instating the charter laws. Let the corporations beg for the right to life, if they think they have the right to soak us in anything they choose without us exercising our right to do exactly as you are saying.

I also want anons who are unfamiliar with light to understand exactly what light is, in the event that they do not understand it is more than the visible spectrum we think of as light, and do not understand what even simple laser pointers can do to your vision, or how doctors use light like a knife these days. When people stick pizza in the microwave, some do not understand they are cooking with "light". But this is not rocket science. Depends on how lousy the high school was. Things obvious to many of us, are not obvious to all of us yet.

>>4443203

I did not even think about this.

Wow.

You are right. Those things are going to have peaks and troughs that change their amplitudes in all kinds of locations that we could not even begin to guess at, because it will literally depend on where two waves would meet and at what angles.

No matter what they start with, and how safe….. the measurement of waves can change as fast as two of the waves meet.

Wow.

>>4443203 (You)

>Why limit the "cells" in question to human cells?

>The "cells" I was speaking of are the regions with a cellular antenna in the center, that transmit/receive cellular comms and are interconnected by high-speed fiber links. You used the word "cells" and said with 5G they are 1000' in diameter. That was the context.

Oh no, I am sorry, I meant that the 5 G towers had to be much closer together unlike the 4 G towers. 4 G towers are about 1000 ft, based on my sons flying. If the towers for 5G have to be within 1000 feet of one another, none of us can get more than 500 feet away from the transmission source. Would it be safe to put your home half way up a 4G tower and live there? That was my question.

The problem with previous studies of WiFi and cellular radiation on biological living tissue is that the studies generally only considered one transmission at a time. In reality, ALL the transmissions arriving at a location in space overlap, with constructive & destructive inference, also creating intermodulation cross-products which can be calculated as the sum, difference, product, etc. of all the impinging frequencies.

Don't let them get away with studying just one transmission in isolation, because that's not reality.

>>4443203

>>4443250

>How would one shield themselves?

That is the point. You can not. It goes through walls. You have to move to the country areas, evacuate city life.

>>4443365

Extradition required. Rule of law will prevent war.

>>4443353

Agreed. But I think Q Team is afraid of a visceral reaction when the crimes are exposed, causing war between nations. Truth is, if all is exposed, and the criminals are extradited, and justice prevails, there would be no war, but the world would be much smarter about who they let run the nations and the international corporate power houses…. and what non profits they donate to, when so many world wide try to help people around the world during disasters.

IMHO, after a certain size or economy of scale, no corporation of any kind, nor the people in it should have any form of privacy rights. The damage one criminal can do in secret, in the wrong place is far too harmful not to require certain decision makers to be wired 24-7 and have their every action, email, etc playing live stream.

Muh privacy does not trump millions dead.