Anybody know why Sec. of Ed. Betsy DeVos still has US Marshall protecting her?

Here's a letter from Grassley (Senate Judiciary) to DeVos and Whitaker asking to provide details and answer these questions. I seem to remember someone saying she had an interesting relative that made her a target, but can't remember now.

1.When the USMS began providing protection for Secretary DeVos, was a threat assessment performed, and who requested the protection?

2.How often does the USMS perform a threat assessment analysis for Secretary DeVos? Please provide the Committee with copies of all threat assessment analyses performed

since the USMS assumed protective detail of Secretary DeVos.

1. Is there currently a credible threat against the safety of Secretary DeVos? If yes, then provide the Committee with the USMS’ most recent threat assessment analysis.

1. Do you consider protecting the Secretary of Education to be a permanent duty of the USMS?

a. If not, then why does the USMS website describe her detail

as “permanent?”

1. Have the Department of Justice, USMS, and Department of Education discussed a possible end-date for Secretary DeVos’ protective detail? If yes, then what steps have the USMS

and Department of Education taken to transition responsibility for her protective service back to the Department of Education?

1. How has the provision of security to Secretary DeVos affected staffing at USMS field offices?

a. Are all USMS field offices properly staffed?

b. Have any U.S. Marshals or other field office personnel raised concerns that they are struggling to complete their current duties due to staffing issues?

c. Were the deputy marshals currently assigned to Secretary DeVos’ protection detail reassigned from field offices? If so, were they replaced?

1. What steps is the Department of Education taking to mitigate the rising costs of Secretary DeVos’ security?

1. What is the status of the Department of Education security team that was formerly assigned to protect Secretary DeVos? Are they still employed at the Department of Education? If yes, then what are their current duties now that they no longer provide security for the Secretary?

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-12-7%20CEG%20to%20DOJ%20ED%20(USMS%20protection%20of%20Secretary%20DeVos).pdf

>>4447197

Well, let's see, he's not Jewish and he likes women. Nope, doesn't fit the Antichrist. Thank you for playing. Want to try again?

>>4447247

Yep, he will be.

https://biblehub.com/library/pink/the_antichrist/i_the_antichrist_will_be.htm

>>4447255

There are many antichrists, but only one Antichrist who will also be called the Beast.

Wasn't the report on election fraud due on 12/22? Did I miss it or did it get delayed because of the govt shut down?

>>4447451

Well, the Dems dropped it from 1.6 to 1.3. Maybe Trump should raise it instead of going down.

But POTUS said once that he could do it for 1/2 that.

>>4447491

And they demonetize MY videos and claim they're conspiracy theories? This guy is full of hooey and I'll bet not one of his videos has ever been demonetized.

>>4447286

Is it possible the shut down was necessary so members of Congress could be arrested?

>The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States. They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.

https://constitutionallawreporter.com/article-01-section-06/

Although, I think most of those who will be arrested will be for felonies or treason so they can be arrested at any time.

>>4447540

That's not why YouTube demonetizes them. You and I know they're queries, but YT sees things differently.