=All posts below are PB=

Q POSTS 2639-2642: Why FAKE! FAKE! FAKE! in 3 of 4 recent posts?

These Q posts seem grouped: all of them focus on FAKE NEWS.

POST 2639 lobbed a bombshell: a twitter post from WaPo reporter Max Boot, a fervent anti-Trumper, doing a 180 on troops in the mid-east between April and Dec 2018. It's tempting to take this news at face value because it's from Q. But Q didn't provide any sauce, so anons went looking. In less than 2 mins, one confirmed that Twitter said it's fake news (>>4408987). Another anon found the original fake meme (>>4409620; radiogunk.com). Another anon thought there might be hidden data in the image (>>4409641). A couple didn't like Q posting fake news (>>4409104, >>4409572). Some of the first discussions ended up in this notable:

>>4409261, >>4409301, >>4409395, >>4409571 Anons discuss WaPo title from Q drop

Meanwhile, Max Boot was deluged with negative twitter messages about his seeming hypocrisy. Within 15 minutes of the Q posting, he responded with a tweet substituting the real headline (>>4409123). Fair enough.

This was soon followed by a WaPo article with this headline: "Someone put a fake headline on one of my columns. Trump supporters bought it and blasted me" This article is in notables (>>4442452), although its title, "Meta fake news," practically hides the post. I only found it thru the Index.

Boot's headline is not fake news, but what follows is. Is his assertion that it originated with Q also true? Maybe. After all, Q sent the message. But the Boot states his objections moves us quickly into the realm of polemics–and pretty nasty polemics, at that:

"And where did this crazy forgery originate? Apparently in the same place as so many Trump conspiracy theories these days: With an anonymous pro-Trump troll named "Q," who claims to be a high-level governmental official sharing details of a vast plat–"QAnon"–that grows more demented by the day."

He goes on to link Trump to the plot, which he correctly says involves "fighting a worldwide ring of pedophiles." Here Boot reveals the truth, but characterizes it as a lie.

———–

After Post 2639, Q goes on to drop three more posts about Fake News.

Questions:

Why did Q drop an example of fake news in 2639? To test us? If so, anons as a collective passed with flying colors.

Why does Q keep pounding on the issue in subsequent posts? In three of the four posts, Q literally shouts about Fake News: FAKE! FAKE! FAKE! This is a very strongly-worded message.

What else we need to understand about fake news? We know the importance of verifying unsauced claims. But what else don't we know at this point? What is Q hinting at here?

My earlier post on this didn't attract discussion (>>4444211); hope the additional sauce gets people as curious as I am.

Dont KEK too much, frens….

but I just hid my own post by accident. Sigh. How do I UNHIDE it? I know the past number but that's about all.

>>4448823

You're talking about the image of Max Boot's tweet? Yes, it's definitely a fake. Been called out numerous times now; was searched out by every anon here when Q dropped.

PS, I accidentally HIDE this post that you're responding to. Do you know how to unhide it?

>>4448839

Right. The April tweet is fake, and he's mad as hell that pro-Q people sent him nasty tweets as a result (because they did not check to make sure the tweet was real, even tho Q labeled it "FAKE NEWS.jpg.") So he paid back Q by writing a nasty article about him (and us).

>>4448847

Right. The April tweet is fake, and he's mad as hell that pro-Q people sent him nasty tweets as a result (because they did not check to make sure the tweet was real, even tho Q labeled it "FAKE NEWS.jpg.") So he paid back Q by writing a nasty article about him (and us).

>>4448884

Thx, can't hurt….I know what the post says, I've been working on it for hours….but geez….

Nice digits, btw

>>4448866

(nice digits!)

What thoughtful comments baker–helps us find other related posts….I posted on FAKE NEWS.

>>4448754

Would love to figure out what's going on with these posts,why Q is pushing so hard right now. Maybe because msm attacks are getting really crazy. I have a list of 150 articles on Q–mostly fake news–but keep getting pulled away to other diggs….

>>4448950

Yeah, I was thinking about it all evening. Seems like it had to be intentional, and Boot seems like a particularly nasty customer….may be worth a dig, anons were digging on him a little right after drop 2639.

>>4448884

Guess what? It works!

>>4448936

It is allowed, and no they are not very nice, but you wouldn't expect nice on 8chan, would you? Maybe real or heartfelt, but not nice.

>>4448984

Clockfags transcend ordinary poetry.

>>4448991

The hatred of Q and patriots is great enough to tell us we're considered dangerous, now that we are awakening. (I guess they thought that shutting down "The Great Awakening" was going to be literal–sorry DS).

>>4448994

I do, too. She is a mesmerizing presence.

>>4449019

>>4449023

Could well be that Q wants us to look hard at Max Boot–he's a real piece of work, churns out tons of anti-Trump article.

Working on this post made me super aware of how easy it is to put things out into the world that have a huge effect, for better or worse.

I assume Q intended this to happen this time; even tho anons caught on super quick to the "fake and gay" nature of the tweet, there's more than just anons lurking here.

The benefit of posting here is that we catch hell from other anons for shortcomings in what we post–which is good. People who lurk don't get that feedback (although what they see might help). There's nothing like screwing up big to create new habits.

>>4449125

You've hit the nail on the head, anon. Up to a point, people DO mutter, drop out, etc. Past that point, they act (like the yellow vests). But what action do they take and when do they take it?

If possible, voting is the right action. But there have to be suitable candidates/issues. If not, then other actions must be considered–like peaceful protests, go-fund-me Wall campaigns, creating dank memes–well, you know.

and then there's my favorite–exposing all the illegal stuff that our leaders have been up to! Why should we have to do something illegal? Why not just expose them? (hint, hint….anybody listening out there?)

There's a lot to do before it comes to considering any illegal acts–you know, like throwing tea into the water…..

>>4449132

There is a lot of talk about people feeling like they can easily suss out shills. But if I were running a crew of shills, I'd have a bunch of "obvious" shills to get anons used to the idea that shills are stupid. And then I'd sic the well-educated, subtle shills who would blend in with anons–until critical moments of vulnerability.

Just a thought.

>>4449159

I've been thinking about this re certain people who are targeted as paytriots, famefags, namefags, etc., more to divisionfag anons than any other reason. It took me awhile to figure out that just because some people jump when you mention some names, it's not everybody. It only takes half a dozen shills to make you think everyone hates a particular person.

>>4449150

there's a lot of guys that are bored and angry–so they show up here to "share"

>>4449168

so you mean somewhere overtly controlled/influenced by mods? or some more subtle form of control?

>>4449185

When you it "works," to what end?

>>4449190

That's why I hope the good guys win.

>>4449197

I'm guessing there's a few anons around who get caught up in shill battles for the same reason. But I'm guessing there are quite a few shill-on-shills fights. Do they know they're fighting one another?