I came across a possible notable, this is pretty big if true. If nothing else, it's a VERY interesting dig and I think is worth the time to check it out.

Twat user starts thread talking about an exchange between @MLChristiansen and a Patreon rep. that, during the exchange (pic1&2), stated that it wasn't Patreon's personal decision to pull users from it's platform over political reasons, it was the card processing companies i.e. VISA, MasterCard, etc. that made the move.

Sauce: https://twitter.com/nickmon1112/status/1076886857445711872

Where this gets into spoopy territory is when MasterCard starts looking to patent analytics that aim to predict political events; including coups and martial law based on credit card data(pic3). This ties back into GOOG. as they're working with MasterCard to determine if online ads are influencing your offline purchases or not.(pic4)

This political grandstanding however might actually be in violation of their terms of service (at minimum) and may crack the door open just enough to make for one hell of a lawsuit against all of the major card issuers. (pic5)

Very interesting read.

>>4448608

>>4448641

I did not, Anon, thanks for the heads up. Sometimes this stuff flies right past me, especially during the day time.

Updated with YouTube sauce.

>>4448734

>>4448608

Sorry, missed the link, posting full transcript of the @MLCHristiansen phone conversation:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U0mQjUA0T5INc_GDkwPJ2mfhO7tbaIogisSqqxHw0hc/edit

>>4448888

I immediately checked the tweets/stories linked in the image Q posted, especially when I saw the "FAKE NEWS" text posted in the Q drop.

When the drop came out I wasn't sure what Q was getting at, even still I'm not entirely sure. Were we meant to dissect the image, determine that the meme is a fake meme – then… Do what exactly?

Was this intended for us to source the image, the user/etc. to determine a point of origin?

Was it intended for us to openly debunk it on social media?

Was it just to get our attention on this Max Boot guy? The guy's a political shitbag of the highest order; plus he's a major Hillary Clinton supporter, but he fits into that paradigm of political nuance that doesn't fit into either a Democratic or Republican platform, the guy reads like a Neocon with Dem tendencies.

The only troubling aspect to the Q drop in question is gives credence to the idea that Q genuinely has to be VERY fucking careful of what he says and how he presents anything… One wrong drop could whip some anons into a frenzy of action without having the facts at their disposal.

>>4449046

Shilly in here tonight…

>>4449132

This looks like the same shit that I remember going on halfchan's /pol/ last year (around the time that Q picked up, or thereabouts).

Hindsight's always 20/20, but looking back now I could see the bots and shills at work. They flooded the boards with so much pro-nazi/anti-jew shitposting that they swung /pol/ into a frenzy of insanity.

You could just see the effects of what happens when you convince a few people that EVERYONE is on board with an idea, and then surround them with what they assume are people that agree with an idea.