>>4449740 (pb)
>Any anons have a good response to this? Seems plausible that HUBER is a smoke screen / distraction to make us think something is happening. I recall reading something about SDNY USAO Berman being the guy looking into the Clinton Foundation. Any thoughts appreciatedβ¦
>REPORT: Huber and Horowitz Investigations Deep State Cons Constructed by DOJβ¦
>https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/12/22/report-huber-and-horowitz-investigations-deep-state-cons-constructed-by-doj/
ββββ
For a balanced view of the Huber/Horowitz/DOJ situation read this guy's twitter thread on the subject: (Brian Cates) @drawandstrike,
https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1076898478419255296
(It's a good read)
And read Jon Solomon's articles about the subject. Jon Solomon has been breaking some of the REAL NEWS as far as I can tell.
Q has been directing anons to the REAL NEWS stories via (Sara Carter) & (Jon Solomon)
βββ
Remember the two witnesses before Congress. They wouldn't turn over evidence when Mark Meadows asked.
Mark Meadows, "Will you turn over your evidence to us?"
Witness asked, "Can you prosecute crimes?"
Mark Meadows, "No."
Thus, witnesses wouldn't turn over evidence.
(DOJ) = PROSECUTES β (NOT CONGRESS)
Pundits screaming "Nothing is happening" are misguiding the public about how the prosecution of the bad guys (HAS-TO) work.
BY THE BOOK.
Even pundits who appear to be patriots can be confused bcuz they don't have the proper view or they're emotional clickbait.