>>4449740 (pb)

>Seems plausible that HUBER is a smoke screen / distraction to make us think something is happening.

Would be telling to see the 2018 Statistical Report on the US Attorney Offices but it is not published yet….

Here is last year's

https://www.justice.gov/usao/page/file/1081801/download

SO PB NOTABLE - MISSING SEMI-ANNUAL CONGRESSIONAL REPORTS & THIS DOJ STAT REPORT ON ALL OF THE US ATTORNEY OFFICES

POTUS not ready to show his hand and confirm the 66,000+ sealed court documents in Annual Reports?

>>4450303

>The case has moved through the federal courts at an unusual clip. Very few disputes reach the Supreme Court just four months after they arose in a trial court, as is true here.

My theory here is it is white hats/'cooperating witness' on both sides setting caselaw precedent for some of the 66,000+ sealed court docs.

It is not normal for both sides of an adversary case to cooperate and get their briefs in so quickly like this with no delays.

>>4450276

>>>4450009 (You) Seems plausible that HUBER is a smoke screen

^^^Not really what I meant….seems more like the HUBER card is being held close to the chest right now

Semi-annual Reports not published

Caseload statistics for US Attorney Offices not published

Huber could very well be behind 66,000+ sealed court docs but the reports that would tell us that have not been published.

>>4450429

Thanks, that works! :-)

Any datafags that can get eyes on this? I'm thinking this may have caseload statistics to help confirm/further analyze the cases pending at the different US Attorney Offices.

I'm getting performance issues when I try to upload to Power BI.

https://www.justice.gov/usao/resources/foia-library/national-caseload-data/2018

>>4450638

>Huber smoke screen is a major departure from the narrative.

>Should be amply sauced.

Baker changed the wording on the HUBER notable

>>4450678

I like the sounds of it!