Baker
Did you see this global about a backdoor censorship add-on?
>>4430721 BO calls out the 'Highest Ranking Post' script
Was a baker last Sunday that said was using it.
Wanted to make sure all bakers were warned about above
so whoever added the script could remove it.
Was this you?
>>4338105, >>4338405 (both pb, also pic)
Ty for baking, and Merry Christmas to you!
The ones that sold out to Big Ag, yes.
Most of the ones that wouldn't
struggle to survive.
Farming is like all other vital services,
controlled by (((them))) w/an iron fist.
>Too much GMO shit today and many farmers don't treat the soil very well (it gets depleted of vital nutrients).
Yup. Ex-pharmafag here.
Fully half the ailments pharma prescribes "meds" for could be remedied with Magnesium & Iodine supplements. And they know it. We need high doses of Mag, especially. No more in soil, no more in food. Most Americans are severely deficient in it. Look up the symptoms, a real eye-opener.
Glad to hear this. As a whole, all of us were slow to wake to the dangers of compromising with what turned out to be "the cabal." But now that we're neck-deep in the effects of it, many are waking and going back to common sense practices. They're still in the minority, but are the brave ones holding the line. Their example will be followed, and we will slowly dig ourselves out of this hellscape we fell into.
Don't think this is a proof, and if it is, it is only weakened by including the seconds delta.
Q and POTUS don't communicate to us via seconds, but minutes. It's been explained that it is impossible to control timestamps of posts or twats to-the-second. Many proofs confirmed on the Q clock, but only those that follow strict minutes=minutes code.
But even if we go with the DO happening twice and corroborating the :19 min. delta, what is the content of Q/POTUS's message? What does 19 signify?
Agreed. Quite a few red flags raised that day. Compiling report for Meta presently.
>What a year+!
No kidding. wew.
>Merry Christmas to all anons!
And to you, baker.
>I will be a lurking back up baker tomorrow
Same here.
I got yer arguments right here:
My claim is you are both faggots.
Can you deny it?
Promoting censorship on a free speech board is faggot.
Promoting filtering based on scary words is censorship.
You engaged in above.
Ergo you are a faggot.
Failing to sauce a claim on a research board is faggot.
Telling others to do your work for you while projecting your failings onto them via gaslighting is a particular brand of Jewish faggot.
You engaged in above.
Ergo you are a Jewish faggot.
Great, we're agreed here:
>I am against all lobbies in all countries, jewish included.
Now will you please stop kvetching
anytime we point out Jewish subversion
so everyone else can learn about the need
to end Jewish lobbying in our countries?
If not, we will know this attempt to soften your narrative
is merely an attempt to offer a bogus "compromise"
so we stop our relentless exposure of
Jewish crime & subversion.
Time will tell, no?
>all is far game at this point and all theories are open.
No. Not if we want to arrive at anything approaching coherent truth.
Logic conforms to standards of mathematical probability based on observable laws of nature. The human mind can create all manner of "connections." If they're not grounded in basic logic and reality, they're just the meanderings of a lunatic.
>It's like inadvertently walking into a gay bar.
kek! Well said.
And good analysis.
(((They))) are masters of pyschology.
They can play us like fiddles.
Well, almost all of us anyway.
>It is a free speech board and you can freely speak on who you filter and who you dont.
Kek.
My attempt to silence your speech IS free speech, goy!
[jewing intensifies]