>I think a lot of old fags just check notables and move on.
What do you guys think of notables lately, in general? What do you like/not like?
>I used to call them out all the time to let the baker know they were opinion or bullshit. It was a losing battle.
>About half are shit
is a trend I've noticed too.
bar has been lowered to "sure why not?"
to pander to normie-boomer feels.
makes me nuts, sometimes I gotta take a break
I still see anons calling out bs.
some bakers are cool about it,
others not so much.
>Depends on the quality of the baker and the helper anons.
Yup. Probably our overall morale, too.
Sometimes you're up for the fight,
other times juice isn't worth the squeeze
>cb does the absolute worse job.
is that right, how so?
at putting stupid unsauced crap in notables?
does he ignore when anons call bs?
would be nice, but who would do the separating? how would the logistics of it work? seems like that's an archive thing.
but what about when anons call out bogus nominations and baker ignores the calls?
notables didn't used to be a reddit-tier upvote system.