>>4458021 lb

>On the discussion of notables and wider:

>notes are best at the moment as they are, including a mix of research, digs and breaking news, as Q has directed us

Agree big picture. The sticking point I think is what qualifies as "research/digs." What do you think about speculation around random number correlation and date prediction? Or seeing possible images of Q?

Such as these?

>>4456111, >>4456519, >>4456544 Anon spots a possible Q on POTUS's phone in Oval Office photo + info on phone

>>4456196 Coincidence? Anon Graphic re: January 18 & 19, Q's poem, post 562, Gen. Flynn header, and next full moon