>>4456561 lb

> How is an unknown number of people on the internet taking sentence fragments that somebody else they don't know

>What you guys are doing is not research.

>When you can go anywhere and look for anything to connect dots to without any kind of parameters or specific discipline that you must stay Within. Lacking any rules that you must abide by in your discipline or lacking any kind of bar of evidence that you must stay within for it to be acceptable… that is not research.

i got a probability of error .95 that i am in error if I reject null hypothesis

h0 (((you))) = fake and gay

fuck off with your concern fagging its insulting to anon intelligence.

–doctoral candidateAnon fluent in inferential methods… that means statistics (also b/g in xbar theory of linguistics aka principles and parameters approach). go elsewhere trying to proscribe what ought and ought not be our standards fucko