dChan
Anonymous ID: e27174 Dec. 24, 2018, 8:12 p.m. No.4459221   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9232 >>9238 >>9245 >>9263 >>9267 >>9297 >>9318 >>9378 >>9463 >>9570 >>9595 >>9602 >>9639 >>9657 >>9724 >>9777 >>9783 >>9793 >>9808 >>9817 >>9862

To all you anons spending christmas on your own, merry christmas

Just finished work on a christmas day here and just gonna spend my day here on the board.

Im use to being in my own and it aint so bad. Suits my introverted personality anyway, so ill raise a glass to you all.

Merry christmas Q, POTUS and the rest of you anons and your families. Hope you all have a great christmas wherever and when it comes.

Anonymous ID: e27174 Dec. 24, 2018, 8:33 p.m. No.4459442   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9603 >>9809 >>9897

Notable from The Strategist (Aus) -PDF report on Australia, China, Huawei, cybersecurity, espionage and the 5G network

 

Please note Anons, I know some of you wont click on files updloaded here, but it is downloadable on the website if you would rather download it from the source - link provided. I will include it here anyway for convenience for those who cant be bothered.

 

https://www.aspi.org.au/report/huawei-and-australias-5g-network

 

'''Over the course of 2018, ASPI staff and writers for The Strategist participated in a dynamic public debate about the participation of Chinese telecommunications equipment manufacturer Huawei in Australia’s 5G network.

 

Australia’s 5G network is critical national infrastructure and this was one of the most important policy decisions the government had to make this year.

 

ASPI felt it was vital to stimulate and lead a frank and robust public discussion, in Australia and throughout the wider region, which analysed and debated the national security, cybersecurity and international implications of Huawei’s involvement in this infrastructure.

 

In this report, in chronological order, you’ll read a range of views written up in The Strategist, The Australian and The Financial Times.

 

These articles tackle a variety of issues surrounding the decision, including the cybersecurity dimension, the broader Australia–China relationship, other states’ experiences with Huawei, the Chinese Government’s approach to cyber espionage and intellectual property theft and, importantly, the Chinese party-state’s view of state security and intelligence work.

 

When it comes to important national security, cybersecurity and critical infrastructure decisions, ASPI will continue to stimulate Australian public discourse and fill gaps in global debates.

 

We also encourage the Australian Government to take a more forward-leaning approach to its participation in public discourse so that the public and key stakeholders are as informed as possible when hard and complicated policy decisions like this need to be made.'''