Baker notable
>>4461070, >>4461096 Goy vs. Jew – who controls the discussion?
It's censorship on SocMed w/o explanation or recourse. Why can Jews mock Christians but not the other way around? And why is posting factual content worthy of such draconian censorship? The theory/argument is:
Jews censor criticism of Jews.
Jews own SocMed.
Jews flout first amendment.
Free Speech is under attack.
>I don’t get why my post got deleted it’s a similar premise to his but it’s funnier and more statistically accurate. He also was doing a joke about Christians so I did one about Jews. I legit don’t get it.
>i know all about the JQ
have you ever put anything in notables
critical of Jews or Israel?
noice! curious what it was. can you enlighten?
>one guy crying about social media bias is not notable
why not? you keep repeating your position but not offering your reasoning. "kek" is not an explanation. He's not "crying," he's pointing out a blatant double-standard resulting in crippling censorship. This is new, relevant content.
You have another anon, >>4461235, finding it suspect that you are refusing to note content critical of Jews, and finding the "kek" argument lacking.
>kek i'm pretty sure i baked the jq edition thread but no i don't remember it feels like a lifetime ago.
Do you mean you put something in notables critical of Israel? Or just referenced the JQ by putting it in a bread title? Cuz putting "JQ" in a bread title can be done sarcastically to mock the issue, like how JIDF says "muh jew."
understood.
>spin it into something relevant to Q research.
-MOS top of the pyramid
-Israeli intel stand down
-saving Israel for last
-8chan will be last stand of free speech
other than that, can't think of much
that makes this relevant to QR.
>you assumed i was a comped baker from the get go
what do you mean?
asked for a notable,
got shot down w/ a kek.
who did the assuming?