Thank You Baker.
Should have ended with:
And if some of us make it,
Through all this unphased,
Then at least the Cabal will have died of old age.
Working on it, it's a pretty indepth read; plus this law stuff reads like stereo instructions. I can't speak to the legitimacy of the document as far as whether it's a legitimate call to prosecution; but I can at least verify that the USC subsections mentioned are legitimate; and the referenced parties are in line with what we know to be true through our research.
Lawfag would need to be the one to confirm authenticity.
A Google search of the case "16-cv-01490-LEK-DJS" however shows varying documents; not sure that they're related, or if it confirms this to be a fake. I think it'd be worth baking into Notables, see if we can't get a lawfag in here to throw in their two cents.
It's all good, it's a fair reminder that a lot of what comes and goes through our research doesn't cross every single anon's path. I didn't take offense to it.
A lot of this DOES ring true, but my biggest gripe is how dismissive the OP is in regards to Obama.
Saying only of Obama, "He doesn't like recklessness", when we know he's a bigger player than that. Spoopy, but the lack of Obama involvement in any of that makes me go, "Meh"