>wait until the end to bitch and moan?
>exactly
Do you mean this request?
>>4461145 lb
looks like it came just about mid-bread
>There seems to be some political truth in it, but the new age crap is crap.
>It has a culture like any other group.
Yes, but that culture is not new age.
>do not ascribe to the religious or para psychological beliefs here
Neither is representative of our movement or chan culture. We're empirically based researchers and political analysts.
Many of us are also proponents of the natural order and nationalism, which overlaps with "traditional values," broadly speaking. But we eschew any particular codified belief system because we know all things codified in the modern era are (((comped.)))
Since Q has referenced the bible and God many times, we incorporate some biblical understanding into our mission. This combined with the "new age" movement's connection to Lucent trust/Luciferian cabal makes new age nonsense even more fringe to the Q movement.
>if I haven't heard back toward the end of bread, I let it go.
But anons are told that if they don't express concern before bread is done, they have no case.
There has to be a better way to address communication between anons and bakers than either always giving anons what they want w/o vettint or always telling them to go fuck themselves w/o rational consideration.
>This one is tasked with targeting you
There are shills that target bakers
for purposes of tearing them and our board down.
I'm not a shill. I'm a dedicated patriot.
My aim is to keep our board strong.
When bakers are under constant shill attack,
and newfags entering every day,
it is important they not become calloused
to legit anon feedback.
>my job is to be able to separate the wheat from the chaff
>my one opinion should not be the end all be all
> sometimes you just have to let it go and try again in another bread. I just figure it's no good trying to talk to a baker when he's baking.
Agreed, end of bread is not a good time to address baker. But wanting things IN notables isn't the only problem. Earlier tonight, oldfags were unhappy about how much crap went in they wanted OUT. Said they stopped even speaking up warning bakers about bs nominations because was "a losing battle," bakers didn't listen. We want to have plenty bakers and we want them well treated, but we don't want it at the expense of having fake & gay shit in notables. MSM takes advantage of it and uses it to malign us. Notables aren't endorsements, but it's still understood they're considered valuable research notes by us. If we can't tell the difference btwn real and fake shit, if we don't even take care to sauce stuff, how can we present ourselves to the public as a trustworthy source of info?
It was put in notables by a baker even though a ton of anons were screaming it was fake. Was like a multi-bread fight to get it removed. If someone read these MSM articles (were a lot of 'em) and came to our site and it wasn't in notables, there would be only a small chance they'd see it in bread, and they'd see anons calling it a fake & gay slide right along side. But if it's there singled out as "notable," that's a different story.
>We can’t get lazy. Neither baker or contributor. We can all do a better job
Ty for this anon, appreciate your attitude. We're a grass-roots, all-hands-on-deck organization. We all have to take pride in our work. I'm so proud of our anons and what we've accomplished. I don't want us to lay down the load in the final stretch just cuz we're fatigued. It's been hard to assimilate newfags, but we need to keep our eye on the prize.
>are you saying these 2 articles were written specifically because that 1 baker included that in notables?
Not at all. Am just displaying that they link the graphic to the QAnon movement – which is based on our board.
Are you saying it wouldn't have mattered had we let that baker leave this shit in notables?
Also of note that the baker came back the next night arguing for its inclusion again.
>Gotta Stick together, stick up for one another, encourage one another and keep fighting for truth.
Amen. It's a special thing we have here. Our fight for truth especially. Everything depends on it.
Merry Christmas, anons
WWG1WGA
>i was that baker for the record. and no i did not come back a whole other night arguing for it. it was brought up while i was baking and i addressed what happened.
apologies baker. the night after (or shortly after) that first struggle over the fire notable, a baker came back on saying was phonefagging baker of the night before, and agreed with anons who were pushing it to be included. that anon argued at least one bread AGAIN with cali anons, saying the patterns in the maps were noteworthy even if the maps weren't representative of what they claimed to be. but maybe that poster was just claiming to be you for some reason.