Must be increasing numbers of newfags posting here.

It's been common knowledge, going back to at least 2016, that General Mattis was on the board of [Theranos] and subsequently resigned.

He has also been a member of (The Hoover Institute) think tank.

And we know he served under Hussein for a while.

———-

His loyalties and roles, good, bad or indifferent; will come out in the wash.

———-

I found it extremely helpful to do A LOT of digging → into the research already done by this (Qresearch-anon community) before I began to post: articles, sauce & analysis.

Tends to be a lot of "dead horse" beating habbening when stuff is just dropped willy nilly.

Thanks to all who seriously contribute. I benefit greatly even from some of the repetition.

Merry Christmas.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Mattis

https://www.hoover.org/profiles/james-mattis

>>4467094

>You compd, Jim

Wrong conclusion, just an anon.

No intention to discourage digs on Mattis.

That's why I said I benefit even from repetitive sauce.

I was referring to the Theranos + Eliz Holmes + Clinton & Hover Institute sauce.

The black eye is definitely a red flag.

That and all the purple tie wearing.

I'd never discourage any investigation.

>>4467126

>>4467156

>>4467078

So I post a little about the subject of prior-known sauce on Mattis and there's responses from anons going in diff. directions ie: pro & con Mattis.

Good example of how difficult it is for us to form (legitimate) solid conclusions till the DECLAS intel spills.

Lots of disinfo is necessary to keep the other side guessing too.

So, I for one, will just content myself to wait and see.

>>4467237

Preaching to the choir anon