Anonymous ID: 255ff1 Dec. 25, 2018, 9:18 p.m. No.4470392   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0693

>>4470286

You're speaking to autists and psy-ops.

 

For some anons, the hardest red pills to swallow will be that not everything that occurs is a fantastic hoax.

 

The real conspiracy of 9/11 is why the hijackers were not intercepted despite being known to intelligence operatives, and some other details about it.

 

I've been around since the whole 9/11 conspiracy routine began, and the research was sabotaged very early on by inserting 'experts' into the picture whose job was to insist 'planes can't do that' and other things. Most people have no experience with construction, aircraft, metallurgy, etc. They are easily convinced of 'facts' because they have no real understanding of the discipline cited.

Effectively, many anon researchers have stayed at a holiday inn last night.

Anonymous ID: 255ff1 Dec. 25, 2018, 9:36 p.m. No.4470600   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4470476

You're kind of stupid. Check your resolution on that video and compression.

 

What this whole "it was a missile!" Nonsense is meant to do is distract you from what was in the Pentagon that was hit, as well as the way the pilot approached that specific side of the Pentagon.

 

The missile is a completely unnecessary degree of complexity to this plan that is not significant to the outcome. What changes about the Pentagon if it was a missile instead of a plane?

 

It's nothing but an argument for the sake of an argument. The video shows it, right there. There is no missile in the arsenal of that size. The object is at least as long as the elevated highway is wide and is a diameter consistent with a 757. If you want to argue that's a missile, then you have to explain where something bigger than an ICBM came from.

 

(((You fucking kikes))).