see:
>>4470714
I think there may be a major problem in this theory - Qs answer about JFK Jr was in reply to a poster with ID 0e29f7, which does not end in "cc". All this fuss is about Qs ID (used all night for the entire Q&A) matching in the last 2 digits to someone ELSE who had asked about JFK Jr, someone Q did not reply to. So that setup is pretty vague and makes a 1-in-256 coincidence not surprising.
I get that. But the entire topic is based on the premise that Q posted with ID 0836cc in response to a question about JFK Jr from ID 7691cc, and that is simply false. (Qs answer was in response to a question from ID 0e29f7.)
With that sauce (look at Q 2611) can you explain how the ID 7691cc is relevant at all?
The original poster did that, and said "Q answered yes to the JFK Jr. question. Check the ID's and do the odds." I checked the IDs and they were not as stated.
OK, now I see what you are discussing. For clarity I'm including a screencap of the qresearch thread, showing Q's reply, the post Q replied to, and the extra ….cc question that followed Q's reply. (This scenario would be pretty confusing for someone jumping ino this fresh, so the screencap may help clarify.)
Also for reference, about 5 people had asked this question in the thread (searching for JFK, which doesn't include the post under discussion which actually said JKF)
As for odds - Q used the same ID throughout the Q & A. There were 271 unique IDs in the bread, if I'm understanding correctly (first time I've cared about reading that count from the catalog.) So it's quite likely that SOMEONE in the bread would have had an ID ending in the same two characters as Qs ID (270 non-Q shots at 1 in 256 odds each).
Lots of people were asking questions in the Q&A. What's special here is that the "queston" came after the "answer". (For what it's worth, ID 7691cc asked this question TWICE; 14 seconds after Q answered, then AGAIN more than a minute later.)
I share your concern about fairness. Although one-time seizure of assets has happened before in some countries, so I suppose there is a precedent for something like this (on the opposite side of the fence) even if it's not really fair, if it's thought to be a system jolt needed for some greater cause.
But I wonder if the rumors of "100% forgiveness of all debts" might be a cabal-seeded meme so anything less is seen as a disappointment to those anticipating the storm.
Putting some other ideas out there:
Debt forgiveness of collectively held debt (like the federal debt) would lift a burden from everyone. (But then, what about people who are depending on Treasuries for their retirement? Seems unfair to take away their retirement because they chose a seemingly federal backed investment vehicle. Would go against the principle of the US honoring debts established from the revolutionary war era.)
Debt forgiveness might be limited to some dollar cap, so it's not seen as a giveaway of mansions to people who plunged into extreme debt.
There could be some shocking revelations of new technology that benefits everyone (cancer cures, antigravity, etc) … things so monumental that no one really cares anymore about the unfairness of a blanket debt forgiveness, because everyone comes out so much ahead.
But it would be a problem if people who lived on beans & rice to not go into debt, see all their sacrifice and prudence erased by the federal government basically giving a huge cash bonus that's only available to people who lived above their means and went into debt.
(If the shoe was on the other foot, if the bonus was only available to wealthy people, then the people who are in debt would understand the problem more clearly. We want a financial reset where EVERYONE benefits, not just some select part of the population.)